Category: Blog

5 Tax Tips for High Earners

4 min read

5 Tax Tips for High EarnersIf you’re a high-income earner, generally defined as household incomes over $350,000, there are some key things you might want to keep in mind come tax season. Here are a few of the strategies to consider that not only maximize your financial benefits but also minimize tax liabilities.

Boost Retirement Contributions

By increasing savings in your 401(k) and IRA accounts, you can reduce your current tax liability while building your nest egg. Here’s a closer look:

  • 401(k)s – In 2026, you can contribute up to $24,500. If you’re over 50, there’s a catch-up option of an extra $8,000, and better still, if you’re between 60-63, the catch-up contribution limit increases to $11,250. By doing these things, you lower your income and, thus, your tax bill.
  • Traditional IRAs – You can contribute up to $7,500 in 2026 with an additional catch-up contribution of $1,100 for individuals age 50 and older. Note that while you can make traditional IRA contributions regardless of income levels, the tax deduction phases out at certain income thresholds.
  • Roth IRAs – These products are popular because they let you sock away after-tax dollars. That said, your eligibility to contribute, capped at $7,500 in 2026, varies with income levels. Taxes are paid up front, but withdrawals, including earnings, are tax-free later. Woot! Beware, however, that the ability to directly contribute to a Roth IRA starts to phase out at $153,000 for single filers and $242,000 for those married filing jointly.

Implement Tax-Efficient Investments

Here are three more strategies to consider for reducing your tax burden:

  • Buy municipal bonds. With these securities, you may gain tax-free income that reduces your taxable income.
  • Buy dividend-paying stocks. Payouts from stocks give you lower-taxed income and wealth growth.
  • Invest in opportunity zones. These zones, defined as underserved, low-income communities, not only offer tax deferral but also provide community investment. Paying it forward pays yourself – and others.

Leverage Charitable Giving

And being strategic about it is critical when trying to reduce your tax bill. For instance, you might set up a donor-advised fund (DAF), which is an efficient way to manage your giving while securing tax benefits. You can set one up through a financial institution or a community foundation. Once you contribute, you’ll get an immediate tax deduction. However, this deduction is subject to certain limitations based on your adjusted gross income (AGI) – 60 percent for cash contributions and 30 percent for contributions of appreciated securities. Still, it reduces your taxable income for the current year. And that’s a good thing.

Gift Assets to Your Family

This is another good strategic move. Both you and your relatives will love it. In fact, the IRS lets you give up to $19,000 per year (as of 2026) without triggering gift taxes. Think college tuition or home down payments. However, while gifting assets can reduce the size of your taxable estate, it does not reduce your taxable income for income tax purposes. But here’s the upside: By using the gift tax exclusion, you’ll avoid increasing your estate tax liability later on.

Utilize Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs)

If you’re retired and over 70 ½, QCDs offer a powerful tax advantage. Get this: you can transfer up to $111,000 annually (in 2026) directly from your IRA to qualified charities without counting that amount as taxable income.

These are just a few of the ways high-earners can strategize for taxes. But no matter what tools and strategies you harness, the goal is to put together a smart plan so you can keep more of what you earn.

 

Sources

https://www.farther.com/foundations/tax-planning-strategies-for-high-income-earners#:~:text=401(k)%20and%20IRA%20Contributions,situation%20and%20provide%20personalized%20advice

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/minimum-salary-required-considered-top-170108488.html?guccounter=1

Understanding Hidden Values

3 min read

Understanding Hidden ValuesCompanies that have assets on their balance sheet, but the values of those assets aren’t accurately reflected, are considered to have hidden value. As part of an investor’s fundamental analysis of a potential investment, it looks at a company’s financial statements, the state of the macro economy, and the business’ competitive position relative to its industry. It looks at assets’ book value, reflected on the balance sheet, compared to what the market values it on a fair value or market price. The difference between the balance sheet price and the prevailing market value is what may be hidden.

Defining Hidden Value

Common areas where hidden value may be found include natural resources, real estate, a business’ customer base, and inventory. When investors evaluate a project and conduct accurate analysis between the balance sheet’s book value and the hidden value they believe the market will price it to in the future, investors may take advantage of the increase in value through early investing.

Real Estate

When it comes to real estate, by the way of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), real estate asset purchases are reported at historical cost. However, real estate values oftentimes rise but are not necessarily reflected on the company’s balance sheet. Since the price is reflected on the balance sheet, minus depreciation, if the real estate’s appraisal sells for at or near the appraised price, the difference shows the potential for hidden value.

Asset Considerations

Regardless of the type of asset, and depending on how the items have been cared for, hidden value may exist in the difference between financial statement value and real-world production capability. Assets that are taken care of impeccably, such as machinery, despite following a depreciation schedule, may have actual value above their reported value. Where intellectual property is involved, the amortization schedule may not reflect the full value if the company uses the IP or licenses it for revenue.

Inventory accounting methods, specifically last-in, first-out (LIFO), can impact hidden value considerations. When inflation is elevated, this method denotes the latest costs to the cost of goods sold. More mature inventory at lower costs is kept on the balance sheet for longer periods. This accounting method reduces the assets’ fair value recorded on the final inventory figure, as well as potentially creating tax benefits by lowering the business’ recorded income.

Customer Loyalty

Businesses that have a strong base of loyal customers often own an undervalued asset of customer loyalty. When customers have established a positive relationship with a company, it can make customers more open to new products or services. By opening an easier reception for future growth, the business creates an asset that’s not completely reflected on the balance sheet.

Conclusion

Regardless of the industry or the type of company, implementing effective accounting analysis and recording is one way to maximize one’s tax obligations and maximize asset value to investors and purchasers. Understanding how to do it is the first step in identifying and strategizing current and future financial plans.

Burying Time Capsules, Ending Payments to Dead People, and Safeguarding Voting Rights for U.S. Citizens

3 min read

Burying Time Capsules, Ending Payments to Dead People, and Safeguarding Voting Rights for U.S. Citizens

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the DC Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025 (HJRes 142) – After passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the Council of the District of Columbia (DC) opted out of the tax code from the Act, amending several provisions and restoring the DC child tax credit. This resolution nullifies DC’s amended legislation. It was introduced on Jan. 22 by Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX). It passed in the House on Feb. 4, the Senate on Feb. 12, and was enacted on Feb. 18.

Semiquincentennial Congressional Time Capsule Act (S 3705) – This bill instructs the Architect of the Capitol to bury a time capsule in the Capitol Visitor Center (on or before July 4, 2026) as part of this year’s 250th anniversary celebration of the nation’s founding. The purpose of the capsule is to represent legislative milestones to date via a joint letter to the future Congress by the majority and minority leaders of the Senate and the House. The time capsule is meant to remain there until July 4, 2276, the nation’s 500th anniversary. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) on Jan. 27. It passed the Senate on Jan. 27, the House on Feb. 9, and was signed into law by the president on Feb. 18.

Bankruptcy Administration Improvement Act of 2025 (S 3424) – This Act was introduced by Rep. Christopher Coons (D-DE) on Dec. 10, 2025, and passed in the Senate on the same day. It cleared the House on Jan. 12 and was signed into law on Feb. 6. The bill makes alterations to the administration of bankruptcy cases by increasing fees paid to trustees in Chapter 7 (liquidation) cases, and extends by five years the fees paid to trustees in Chapter 11 (reorganization) cases. It also extends the term of bankruptcy judgeships in various districts, as well as other provisions.

Ending Improper Payments to Deceased People Act (S 269) – This legislation requires the Social Security Administration (SSA) to share its death records with the Treasury Department in order to prevent improper payments to deceased individuals. In the past, this bill had to be extended every three years, but the new bill makes the requirement permanent. The bill was introduced by Sen. John Kennedy (R-TN) on Jan. 28, 2025. It passed unanimously in the Senate on Sept. 19, 2025, cleared the House on Jan. 13, and was enacted on Feb. 10.

Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (S 1383) – This controversial voting bill passed in the House on Feb. 11. The Republicans in the Senate have secured 50 votes for passage, but the bill requires 60. The provisions in the current bill include requiring:

  • Each state is to submit full voter rolls to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for verification of citizenship via its SAVE system, which has historically had a high error rate of flagging citizens as non-citizens.
  • Voter roll purges every 30 days and end the 90-day quiet period that allows voters mistakenly purged time to re-register before Election Day.
  • New or changing voter registrants to show proof of U.S. citizenship (birth certificate or passport; five states already meet this requirement for a Real ID driver’s license).
  • Voters to show photo ID at polls in order to vote (38 states already require this)
  • A ban on automatically mailing ballots to all voters (currently used by eight states and DC); voters would have to send individual requests to receive a mail ballot.

Democrats in the Senate have vowed to block passage via filibuster.

 

Cloud Sovereignty vs. Big Tech: How Businesses Are Avoiding the ‘AI Lock-in’ Trap in 2026

4 min read

Cloud SovereigntyArtificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a competitive advantage; it has become a necessary infrastructure. Businesses now heavily rely on AI-powered systems, from automated customer service to predictive analytics and decision-making tools. These platforms are cloud-based, and their reliance comes with growing concern of AI lock-in. This dependence on major cloud providers and the convenience of Big Tech ecosystems can turn into long-term dependency. In response, cloud sovereignty is gaining momentum.

What Is Cloud Sovereignty?

Cloud sovereignty refers to the ability of an organization to maintain full control over its data, infrastructure, and digital assets. This includes where data is stored, how it is processed, and which legal jurisdiction governs it.

Unlike traditional cloud hosting, where companies rely on a single global provider, cloud sovereignty emphasizes:

  • Data ownership and portability
  • Compliance with local laws and regulations
  • Reduced dependence on foreign-controlled infrastructure
  • Strategic control over AI models and workflows

The Rise of Big Tech and the AI Lock-in Problem

Over the past decade, companies like AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure have built highly integrated AI ecosystems, especially since the surge of generative AI. These platforms offer powerful tools, including proprietary machine learning services, exclusive Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), pre-trained AI models, and seamless infrastructure scaling.

However, when businesses build their AI systems entirely on one provider’s proprietary tools, switching becomes difficult. Platform dependency can also create serious risks when a vendor fails. A good example is the collapse of Builder.ai, an AI app builder backed by giants like Microsoft and the Qatar Investment Authority. Its collapse was an indicator that companies do not have complete control over the software and data on which their operations depend. This is what is known as AI Lock-in, where:

  • AI models rely on proprietary APIs
  • Data pipelines are optimized for a specific cloud architecture
  • Workflows depend on unique vendor tools
  • Migration costs become prohibitively high

As a result, businesses suffer:

  • Escalating operational costs
  • Limited negotiating power
  • Reduced flexibility
  • Strategic vulnerability

In 2026, with AI deeply embedded into operations, being locked-in can threaten long-term agility and innovation.

Regulatory Pressure is Accelerating the Shift

Governments worldwide are tightening digital sovereignty and data protection rules. From stricter data residency laws to AI governance frameworks, compliance is no longer optional. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications face heightened scrutiny. They must prove where data is stored, who can access it, and how AI models are trained and governed. Additionally, businesses can’t afford regulatory risks. Regulations such as the CLOUD Act demand data access transparency, while different states are pushing for data localization policies.

Relying entirely on a foreign-controlled AI ecosystem can raise compliance risks. In some regions, businesses are now required to use local or sovereign cloud providers for sensitive workloads. Gartner predicts 35 percent of countries will adopt region-specific AI platforms by 2027 as countries increase investment in domestic AI stacks to meet sovereignty goals.

Regulation, once seen as a burden, is now a strategic driver pushing companies toward sovereign-first strategies.

How Businesses Are Avoiding AI Lock-in Trap

Businesses are not abandoning cloud AI. Instead, they are becoming more strategic about how they implement it.

  1. Embracing open-source and interoperable AI
    Many businesses are adopting open-source AI frameworks and models to reduce dependency on proprietary systems. By building on interoperable standards, they maintain flexibility to deploy workloads across different environments. This approach allows businesses to experiment freely without being tied to a single vendor’s ecosystem.
  2. Adopting multi-cloud and hybrid strategies
    Rather than relying on one provider, a business can distribute workloads across multiple clouds. This reduces operational risk, strengthens negotiation leverage, enhances flexibility and improves resilience. Hybrid models, where on-premise infrastructure is combined with cloud services, are also growing in popularity. They ensure sensitive data remains locally controlled while still leveraging AI scalability.
  3. Partnering with sovereign or regional cloud providers
    Regional cloud providers are gaining traction as they offer local data hosting, compliance with national regulations, and greater transparency.
  4. Strengthening contract and governance frameworks
    Procurement and legal teams are now playing a more active role in cloud decisions. They negotiate stronger data portability clauses, clear exit strategies, transparent pricing structures, and model ownership rights.

Final Thoughts

In 2026, the real risk is not using AI, but losing control over it.

Cloud sovereignty represents a strategic shift while not rejecting Big Tech. It must be viewed as the ability to act strategically, as no business can dominate every layer of the AI stack due to constraints like the high cost of training advanced AI models.

Businesses that prioritize sovereignty today are building resilient, flexible, and future-ready AI ecosystems. Those who ignore it may find themselves powerful – but trapped.

Understanding Qualifying Dispositions

3 min read

Understanding Qualifying DispositionsWith 57 percent of public companies offering their workers employee stock purchase plans (ESPPs), according to the National Association of Stock Plan Professionals (NASPP), understanding how qualifying dispositions work is an essential skill.

The concept refers to someone selling or otherwise “disposing” of equities who sees advantageous tax benefits. This is especially pronounced when a stockholder’s normal tax income rate differs markedly from prevailing tax rates for long-term investments.

Eligible individuals are those employed by a company that offers such a benefit. There are two different options available for worker participation.

The first option is where employees participate in the ESPP. The second option is through an incentive stock option plan (ISOs). It’s noteworthy to distinguish that the ESPP is for most employees employed after a particular time at a company. However, ISOs are reserved primarily for senior management and executives, such as chief financial officers (CFOs), chief executive officers (CEOs), etc.  

What determines if it’s a qualifying disposition is how long the employee keeps the equities prior to the sale.

ESPP Example

If 100 shares are acquired via ESPP, bought via a 10 percent discount to the prevailing offer of $40, the purchase of 100 shares of stock at $36 equals $3,600. If the stock appreciates to $60 in the future, the difference (and capital gain) would be $2,400 in profits ($6,000 – $3,600).

Qualifying Disposition Example

This scenario breaks down how the discount and, ultimately, how capital gains are treated.

The discount of $4 per share is taxed at the employee’s present wage rate. Depending on the tax rate the employee is taxed at, the liability would be ($4 a share, multiplied by 100, times the tax rate of 30 percent or $120).

Using the ESPP example’s figures, the long-term gain of $24 per share (times 100 shares) is taxed based on the lesser rate of say 15 percent. ($3.60/share times 100 = $360).

Therefore, the entire taxes owed end up being $120 + $360 = $480.

Non-Qualifying Disposition Example

However, for stock liquidations not meeting qualifying disposition criteria, the $2,400 would see a 35 percent capital gains tax ($2,400 multiplied by 35 percent = $840).

Based on the qualifying versus non-qualifying distribution scenarios, the difference of $360 in capital gains savings represents a stark contrast in tax obligations. Therefore, it’s important to determine how to meet a qualifying disposition.

It requires the following criteria to be met. The stock sale date must occur at a minimum of 12 months from the stock purchase date. It also must be held for at least 24 months from the ESPP offer date or the ISO stock warrant date.

While transactions may differ in the quantity of shares sold and for how much, the timing for workers selling the shares is far less variable. It is important for employers to ensure workers are familiar with the tax implications.

 

Sources

https://www.naspp.com/blog/five-trends-in-espps

What Your Tax Preparer Wishes You Already Knew

5 min read

Most people approach tax season thinking about one thing: getting their return done. What they rarely think about is what the experience looks like from the other side of the desk. Having seen it from both angles, I can tell you there’s a real difference between clients who make a preparer’s job easy and those who quietly make it harder than it needs to be.

Here’s why that matters to you specifically: being a better client isn’t about being polite for politeness’ sake. It translates directly into lower bills, faster turnarounds, and better advice. This is entirely in your own interest.

First, Understand How You’re Being Charged

The way the preparer bills you should shape how you work with them. There are three common arrangements, and each one rewards organization in a different way.

If you’re on a flat fee, the dollar amount doesn’t change whether your documents are immaculate or a complete mess. But here’s what does change: a preparer who powers through your tidy file in two hours now has time to actually think about your situation. That might mean spotting a deduction you’ve been missing for years or flagging something worth changing before next filing season. Advice like that can easily be worth more than the return preparation itself, but it only happens when there’s time and mental energy left over to give it.

Hourly billing leaves no room for ambiguity. Every follow-up email, every clarifying phone call, every minute your return sits untouched while you track down a missing form, it all runs the meter. Most of that extra cost is entirely preventable with a little upfront effort.

The hybrid model, which is a base fee with overage charges for complexity, is the most common setup you’ll encounter. Most preparers are generous about absorbing minor extra work without comment. But when documents arrive in scattered batches, questions go unanswered for days, and the timeline keeps slipping, that goodwill has a limit. And again, the extra charges that result are almost always avoidable.

There’s one more piece to this that doesn’t show up on any invoice. Tax preparers are human, and like anyone doing service work, they have clients they genuinely enjoy and clients they quietly dread. The ones they enjoy tend to get more, for example, a heads-up about a planning opportunity, a faster turnaround when things are hectic, and a little extra thought applied to their situation. Difficult clients still receive competent, professional service. They just don’t get the extras. That’s not a policy; it’s just how people work.

The Three Things That Actually Move the Needle

None of this requires becoming a tax expert. It really comes down to three habits.

Send everything at once, and send it organized. Before you submit anything, set aside an evening to go through your documents. W-2s, 1099s, interest statements, charitable contribution records, mortgage forms, gather everything. If your preparer sends you an intake organizer or questionnaire, use it. It exists because it tells them exactly what they need in the format that’s easiest to work with. If they don’t use one, just organize things logically and label your files clearly. “Scan_final_2” is not a file name. A small amount of effort on your end saves a disproportionate amount of time on theirs.

Don’t send documents as they trickle in. It’s tempting to forward your W-2 the moment it hits your inbox, making you feel like you’ve gotten ahead of things. In practice, piecemeal delivery creates more problems than it solves, for example, things get overlooked, work gets duplicated, and many preparers won’t even open a file until they believe everything has arrived. There are legitimate exceptions: a K-1 that shows up late, a corrected 1099 that comes in after the fact. Any experienced preparer will understand those situations. But make them the exception rather than your default approach.

Respond promptly when they reach out. When your preparer sends you a question, it usually means they’re actively working on your file and have hit a wall they can’t get past without your input. A week-long delay doesn’t just slow things down; it forces them to set your return aside entirely and context-switch back to it later. That kind of stop-and-start cycle costs time, and depending on your billing arrangement, it may cost you money too.

Conclusion

A single organized evening and a commitment to responding quickly when questions come up. That’s genuinely most of what separates the clients’ preparers who enjoy working with them from the ones they don’t. In return, you get a smoother process, a more accurate return, and very likely some guidance you’d never have received if you’d shown up with a shoebox and gone quiet.

What to Expect from U.S. Tax Policy in 2026

4 min read

What to Expect from U.S. Tax Policy in 2026After a whirlwind 2025 that produced what may be the largest tax bill in American history, the coming year looks dramatically different. Tax policy experts are predicting a legislative standstill, a turbulent tax filing season, and lingering questions about how new provisions will work when put into practice.

A Year of Legislative Gridlock

The forecast for 2026 tax legislation is bleak. With Republicans clinging to an impossibly thin House majority of just 218 or 219 seats following recent resignations, passing any significant bills will be extraordinarily difficult. Every single Republican vote would be needed to advance legislation through reconciliation, and as 2025 demonstrated, keeping the caucus unified is no small feat.

While there has been discussion about a potential second reconciliation bill, most observers view this as wishful thinking. If such a bill were to materialize, it would likely focus on technical corrections to lingering Tax Cuts and Jobs Act issues and problems that emerged from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. One notable concern involves accelerated research credits that did not deliver the benefits lawmakers intended because of unexpected interactions with the corporate alternative minimum tax.

The more pressing concern will simply be keeping the government running. A January deadline looms to avoid another shutdown and, given the contentious relationship between House Republicans and Democrats throughout 2025, even basic funding bills face uncertain prospects. With midterm elections consuming attention in the second half of the year, legislative bandwidth for tax policy will be virtually nonexistent.

A Rough Road Ahead for Taxpayers

The 2026 tax filing season is shaping up to be challenging. The IRS has experienced unprecedented upheaval, losing somewhere between 20 percent and 25 percent of its workforce through a combination of voluntary resignations and reductions in force. Many of these departures came from enforcement divisions, though customer service will also feel the impact.

Leadership instability has compounded these problems. The agency cycled through roughly seven commissioners or acting commissioners in 2025 alone. Former Congressman Billy Long was confirmed as commissioner but lasted less than two months before departing under unclear circumstances. The Treasury Secretary has since taken direct oversight of the agency, and an IRS CEO position was created for the first time in the agency’s history. No new commissioner nominee has been put forward, and there is currently no Senate-confirmed chief counsel either.

For taxpayers who need more than basic return processing, this means longer wait times, fewer answered phone calls, and potential delays. Those filing straightforward W-2 returns seeking refunds will likely fare better than individuals or businesses with complicated situations requiring IRS assistance. Audit rates will decline intentionally, as the current administration has committed to scaling back the enforcement emphasis of the Biden years.

The Justice Department’s Tax Division also has been gutted, losing many qualified litigators who previously maintained an exceptional track record against large taxpayers in court. This erosion of enforcement capability may not immediately move voluntary compliance numbers, but continued cuts will eventually catch up with the system.

Unresolved International Questions

The relationship between U.S. tax policy and the global minimum tax framework under Pillar 2 remains unsettled. Republicans declined to include a retaliatory tax provision known as section 899 in last year’s legislation based on an agreement with G20 nations. If that agreement unravels, there may be pressure to revisit retaliatory measures, though passing such legislation with current House margins seems unlikely.

American companies operating internationally could face pressure in foreign jurisdictions if the United States fails to align with Pillar 2 requirements. While many in Washington believe the international minimum tax framework will collapse, the reality on the ground suggests otherwise, and this disconnect might force future legislative action.

Conclusion

The bottom line for 2026: expect a holding pattern on major tax legislation and brace for a difficult filing season as an understaffed and unsettled IRS works to implement last year’s massive changes.

Accounting Considerations for Senior Debt

3 min read

What is Senior DebtAlso known as a Senior Note, Senior Debt consists of a company’s outstanding loans collateralized by the business’ assets. As the name implies, Senior Debt holders are the first claimants of the business’ cash flows and/or liquidated assets if that business defaults on its debt and files for bankruptcy. Subordinated or junior debt in the form of Preferred and Common Equity shares has claims to any subsequent assets – but only after Senior Debt holders are made whole. 

Originating via financial institutions, revolving credit facilities, and Senior Term Debt are the primary ways companies obtain financing. Whether the debt is funded by another business, an individual backer, or a traditional bank lender, if the borrowing company files for bankruptcy and liquidates its assets, Senior Bondholders are first in line for available repayment.

Senior Debt Characteristics and Structure

Much like any type of borrowed money, each tier has different interest rates and amortization schedules, including Senior Debt. Senior Debt issuers put terms in the debenture restricting companies from issuing additional, lower-tier debt. Debt issuers often require borrowers to maintain specific credit profiles, which are determined by financing ratios such as interest service coverage and debt service coverage.

Other stipulations may include requiring the borrower to maintain or refrain from business activities beyond their essential commercial functions. If the stipulations are flouted, the lender may retract, modify the borrowing terms, or mandate immediate payment of accrued interest and principal. It’s important to note that since Senior Debt has more restrictive terms, interest rates are generally lower compared to unsecured/less senior debt.

When it comes to unsecured debt, primarily junior or subordinated debt, although it’s not collateralized, the terms stipulate that the lender(s) have a claim to the company’s assets in case of bankruptcy/liquidation and are next in line to get paid off from the assets of the company, minus any pledged assets for secured debt debtholders.

Accounting Considerations

The first step to account for Senior Debt is to break it up into short-term and long-term debt (within 12 months and longer than 12 months). For example, long-term debt, which turns into long-term liabilities from short-term obligations, like accounts payable, is recorded on the company’s balance sheet. This generally happens when the short-term obligations are re-classified into a lengthier note.

If a business obtains a $10 million bank loan, secured by their machinery and other assets, for a new product line, with a 7 percent interest rate for 15 years, along with the business assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity, the long-term portion would be reported on the company’s balance sheet. It would be recorded as a liability on the balance sheet, where any other long-term debt and bonds issued or borrowed by the company.

The income statement would document its loan interest. It’s calculated by taking the principal multiplied by the interest rate.  Once the interest is determined, it’s classified as an expense on the income statement, lowering the company’s net income and profits. As the loan’s principal is paid over the 15-year loan life, a set amount of the loan principal is repaid each year.

Conclusion

Senior Debt can be an effective way to obtain funding, but businesses must understand how funding agreements work and how to properly account for them.

 

Completing FY2026 Budget Appropriations, Protecting Trafficked Victims, and Vetoing Special Interest Projects

3 min read

HR 6938Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026 (HR 6938) – This Act is one of the remaining budget bills to fund the government through Sept. 30, 2026. It includes funding for several agencies, including the Department of Commerce, the Department of Justice, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Energy, and the Environmental Protection Agency. The bill was introduced by Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) on Jan. 6. It passed in the House on Jan. 8, the Senate on Jan. 15, and was signed into law on Jan. 23.

Financial Services and General Government and National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2026 (HR 7006) – This Act was introduced by Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) on Jan. 12. Yet another fiscal year 2026 budget bill, it authorizes investments to support economic growth and entrepreneurship, safeguard American security and authorize funding for the Executive and Judicial branches. The bill passed in the House on Jan. 14 and is awaiting passage in the Senate.

Trafficking Survivors Relief Act (HR 4323) – The purpose of this bipartisan bill is to help stop a vicious cycle that makes human trafficking victims vulnerable to further exploitation. The Act enables survivors to file motions to vacate non-violent convictions and purge arrest records for certain criminal offenses committed as a direct result of being trafficked. The current iteration of the bill was introduced by Rep. Russell Fry (R-SC) on July 19, 2025. It cleared the House on Dec. 1, the Senate on Dec. 18, and was signed into law on Jan. 23.

Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act (HR 131) – Introduced by Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) on January 3, 2025, this bill is related to a Colorado water infrastructure pipeline currently under construction, designed to port clean water from the Pueblo Reservoir to 50,000 Coloradans in the local area. The bill would have extended the repayment period for local municipalities and removed interest payments. The bill passed in the House on July 21 and in the Senate on Dec. 16; it was vetoed by the President on Dec. 31, 2025.

Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act (HR 504) – This bill would have authorized the expansion of the Miccosukee Reserved Area to include a portion of Everglades National Park in Florida. In recent years, the area, known as Osceola Camp, has been prone to flooding, and this bill would have authorized safeguard measures to protect structures within the camp. The bill was introduced on Jan. 16, 2025, by Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-FL). It passed in the House on July 14 and in the Senate on Dec. 11, 2025. The bill was vetoed by the President on Dec. 30 and failed an override vote in the House on Jan. 8.

Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 2025 (S 222) – This Act amends the existing National School Lunch Act to allow schools participating in the federal school lunch program to serve whole milk. It was introduced by Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) on Jan. 23, 2025, passed the Senate on Nov. 20, the House on Dec. 15 and was signed into law by the President on Jan. 14.

Reclaiming the Rent: Why 2026 is the Year Businesses Switch from SaaS to Sovereign Ownership

4 min read

Businesses Switch from SaaS to Sovereign OwnershipEvery modern business is paying rent. Not for office space or equipment, but for the digital infrastructure that runs the company. This might include the cost of CRMs, email platforms, project management tools, automation tools, analytical dashboards, and countless other tools designed to solve a specific business need. Individually, these tools seem affordable; collectively, they form a permanent tax on business growth.

For several years now, software-as-a-service (SaaS) has been sold as a form of freedom. Businesses were promised low upfront cost, instant deployment, and minimal complexity. For a long time, SaaS delivered on this promise. It helped companies move faster, scale quickl,y and compete globally regardless of size.

But this is shifting. Now, business leaders are beginning to question whether renting critical systems is still a worthy strategy.

The SaaS Era

The rise of SaaS was a necessary evolution. It lowered the entry barrier for tools that once required large IT teams and a huge capital investment.

However, this convenience turned into dependency. Businesses not only adapted SaaS tools, but they also built operations around them. Third-party platforms now hold business workflows, customer data, analytics, automations, and even institutional knowledge. This means that a business has dozens of subscriptions they don’t fully control, can’t meaningfully customize, and must keep paying for to keep operating.

What Sovereign Ownership Means

Sovereign ownership doesn’t mean abandoning the cloud or rejecting modern technology; it means owning the core logic of your business systems. The sovereign models emphasize self-management, control and long-term resilience.

When a business practices sovereign ownership, it controls:

  • Where data resides (e.g., virtual private clouds or sovereign clouds)
  • Access permissions and encryption keys
  • Workflows and automations
  • Internal knowledge systems
  • AI models and training data
  • The ability to move, adapt, or rebuild without needing vendor permission

Self-sovereign identity has been a great support for this shift. SSI protocols allow businesses, employees, and customers to control their digital identities and credentials without relying on centralized identity providers. This means that identity is not locked inside the SaaS platform, as it is portable, verifiable, and owned by the entity itself.

The Real Cost of SaaS Goes Beyond the Invoice

SaaS costs more than renting the service. Aside from monthly or annual subscriptions that compound into a huge expense over time, vendor lock-in makes switching platforms painful and risky. The pricing models also keep changing. Features may be removed or placed under higher payment tiers. Other issues include broken integrations and limited or messy data exports.

More critically, companies adapt their workflows to match the SaaS tools, rather than the tool serving the business. Therefore, innovation is constrained by what the platform allows and not what the business needs.

The biggest risk is when a SaaS provider is acquired, suffers downtime, or shuts down entirely. When this happens, your business absorbs the impact without control or leverage.

Why 2026 Is the Turning Point

Why now? Because the alternatives have finally matured. Decentralized physical infrastructure (DePIN), the maturity of enterprise-grade, open-source software, and modular cloud architecture have made system ownership accessible without deep technical teams. AI has transformed how businesses build, automate, and maintain internal tools. Modular infrastructure allows companies to own their core while selectively renting specialized services.

At the same time, external pressure is increasing as data privacy regulations tighten. Regulatory frameworks like the U.S. Cloud Act, the GDRP and the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) demand operational independence that SaaS cannot fully deliver. Gartner predicts that by 2030, 75 percent of enterprises outside of the United States will implement data sovereignty strategies due to regulatory scrutiny and geopolitical tensions.

Major players are already responding. IBM is one example of the shift, as they already announced IBM Sovereign Core, software that helps businesses take back control of their data and systems.

Customers are also more aware. They want to know how their data is stored, processed, and protected. AI models trained on proprietary information raise new questions of ownership and risk. In an uncertain global economy, businesses want cost predictability and not endless variable subscriptions.

The mindset is shifting from speed at any cost to resilience by design.

From Renters to Owners

SaaS helped businesses grow. But growth built on dependency has limits.

2026 represents a strategic window where ownership is finally accessible, affordable, and necessary. The shift toward sovereign systems is not about rebellion against technology that has previously helped businesses. It’s about leverage, resilience, and long-term value.

The future belongs to businesses that stop renting their foundations and start owning their future.