Author: Service2Client

Understanding IRS Forms 1099 for Lawsuit Settlements

Understanding IRS Forms 1099 for Lawsuit SettlementsThe Basics of Tax Reporting in Legal Settlements

When you collect a settlement for a lawsuit, you’ll likely also receive a Form 1099 from the IRS. This form serves as a reminder to pay taxes on your settlement; copies are sent to both you and the IRS. These forms match reported income for income tax purposes, making them critical for accurate tax filing.

In lawsuit contexts, two common forms 1099 are issued:

  • Form 1099-MISC: This version can include various types of settlement payments, often termed other income
  • Form 1099-NEC: Used specifically for non-employee compensation

Understanding the Difference Between Forms

The distinction between these forms is significant. A Form 1099-NEC informs the IRS that taxes for self-employment should be collected in addition to income taxes. This form is appropriate if you were a non-employee contractor suing for unpaid compensation.

However, in cases like wrongful termination or emotional distress claims, you’ll want the non-wage portion reported on Form 1099-MISC instead of Form 1099-NEC to avoid unnecessary self-employment taxes. Pay close attention because filing an incorrect form can be difficult to correct later.

Double Reporting: When 100% Becomes 200%

A surprising aspect of legal settlement tax reporting is that defendants often issue forms 1099 totaling 200% of the actual settlement amount.

  • The plaintiff receives a 1099 for 100% of the settlement
  • The plaintiff’s attorney receives a 1099 for 100% of the settlement

This duplicate reporting occurs because the IRS requires defendants to report the full settlement amount to both parties when payments are made jointly or through the attorney’s trust account. This is done because the defendant may not be aware of how the money is ultimately divided between client and attorney.

Legal Fees and Tax Treatment

The U.S. Supreme Court decided in the case Commissioner v. Banks that gross income for a plaintiff typically includes the part of the settlement paid to their attorney as legal fees. This means you might be taxed on money you never actually received.

To address this issue, plaintiffs should understand when they can deduct legal fees:

  • Plaintiffs in employment cases, civil rights cases, and most whistleblower cases qualify for deductions
  • Legal fees must typically be paid in the same year as the settlement (as in contingent fee arrangements)
  • Outside these case types, deducting legal fees becomes much more difficult
  • Even in personal physical injury cases, complications arise if punitive damages or interest are awarded

Tax Planning Before Settlement

It’s best to deal with tax reporting before finalizing your settlement agreement. Consider these strategies:

  1. Include specific provisions about which forms 1099 are to be issued
  2. Specify the recipients, amounts, and even which boxes should be completed on the forms
  3. For physical injury cases that should be tax-free, get written commitments about tax reporting
  4. Consider separate checks to lawyer and client when appropriate (though this may not fully prevent attribution of legal fees to plaintiffs)

Without express provisions in your settlement agreement regarding tax forms, correcting any errors later becomes extremely difficult.

Tax-Free Settlements

Some settlements can be totally free of taxation, such as cases where compensation is granted as damages for physical injury. In typical injury cases like auto accidents, damages should be tax-free, but only if there are no punitive damages and no interest as part of the settlement.

Even when you believe your settlement qualifies as tax-free, securing written confirmation about tax reporting in your settlement agreement provides important protection.

Conclusion

Understanding the tax implications of your lawsuit settlement before signing an agreement can save significant headaches and potentially reduce your tax burden. Consulting with a tax professional who specializes in legal settlements is advisable for complex cases.

Treasury Declares New Beneficial Ownership Reporting Law Will Apply Only to Foreign Companies

BOI Law Will Apply Only to Foreign CompaniesThe Trump Administration announced it will no longer apply the beneficial ownership information (BOI) requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) to domestic companies. This declaration came first via social media, marking a significant shift in policy.

Under this new directive, U.S. businesses are exempt from the BOI reporting requirements of the CTA. The Treasury Department made the initial announcement on social media, followed by an official press release and a Truth Social post from President Donald Trump, who described the requirement as “outrageous and invasive.”

The bipartisan CTA was originally designed to combat illegal activities like drug trafficking and money laundering by limiting the use of anonymous shell companies. While the ownership information would have been available to law enforcement agencies, it would not have been publicly accessible.

In its March 3 website statement, the Treasury Department clarified that it will not enforce penalties or fines related to the BOI reporting rule under current regulatory deadlines established during the Biden Administration. Furthermore, it will not impose penalties against U.S. citizens, domestic reporting companies or their beneficial owners after new rule changes are implemented.

Treasury’s proposed rules will limit required reporting to foreign companies only, though the precise scope remains unclear – whether this applies exclusively to foreign companies registered in the United States or extends to U.S. companies with foreign ownership.

Previously, reporting requirements covered all businesses formed in the United States and foreign companies registered to operate in any U.S. state or tribal territory.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), which oversees CTA enforcement, appears to have been surprised by this policy change. Days earlier, following court decisions that permitted BOI reporting requirements to proceed, FinCEN had announced plans to extend reporting deadlines to March 21. As of the most recent update, FinCEN’s website has not reflected the Treasury’s announcement, and requests for comment went unanswered.

What Happens Now?

This unexpected announcement has created uncertainty for businesses, particularly regarding already-submitted data.

The law required detailed information from “beneficial owners,” including names, birthdates, addresses, and identification documents. Similar information was required from company applicants – typically individuals who helped establish the company.

Millions of companies had already complied before this announcement, raising questions about the handling of submitted information. Inquiries to FinCEN about the fate of this data have not received responses.

The status of pending legal cases also remains uncertain. Cases continue through at least four federal appellate courts, and additional litigation may emerge to compel administration compliance with the law.

Crucially, the Corporate Transparency Act itself remains valid legislation. Despite the Treasury’s position, the executive branch cannot overturn the laws passed by Congress. It can, however, choose selective enforcement – similar to approaches seen with cannabis legislation. This creates potential complications, as future administrations could reinstate full enforcement.

Protecting Critical Supply Chains, Recycling Programs and Victims of Digital Forgeries

s 257, hr 825, s 351, s283, s 146, s281, s246Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025 (S 257) – Introduced by Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) on Jan. 2, this bill is designed to promote resilient critical supply chains by identifying, preparing for, and responding to supply chain shocks to critical industries. The ultimate goal of the legislation is to encourage the growth and competitiveness of production and manufacturing in the United States using emerging technologies. The bipartisan legislation is currently under consideration in the Senate.

To prohibit individuals convicted of defrauding the Government from receiving any assistance from the Small Business Administration, and for other purposes (HR 825) – This bipartisan legislation would prohibit a small business with a high-level associate convicted of any crime related to financial misconduct involving a covered loan or grant from receiving any financial assistance from the SBA. It was introduced by Rep. Roger Williams (R-TX) on Jan. 28 and is currently under consideration in the House.

STEWARD Act of 2025 (S 351) – This bill was introduced by Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) on Jan. 30. It would establish a pilot grant program to improve recycling accessibility and require the Environmental Protection Agency to collect and report on recycling and composting programs in the United States. The bipartisan bill is currently under consideration in the Senate.

Illegal Red Snapper and Tuna Enforcement Act (S 283) – This bill was introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Jan. 28 and is under consideration of the Senate. It would require the development of a standard methodology to identify the country of origin of seafood transported for sale in the United States to support enforcement against illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing.

TAKE IT DOWN Act (S 146) – Also introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), the purpose of this bill (also known as the Tools to Address Known Exploitation by Immobilizing Technological Deepfakes on Websites and Networks Act) is to remove visual depictions of intimate acts from the Internet. Currently, machine learning, artificial intelligence and other computer-generated technologies are being used to create digital forgeries of identifiable people, including minors, without their consent. This bipartisan legislation was introduced on Jan. 16, passed in the Senate on Feb. 13, and currently lies with the House.

TICKET Act (S 281) – This bipartisan bill would require sellers of event tickets to disclose all relevant information about ticket prices and related fees to consumers at the point of sale in order to prohibit speculative and predatory ticketing. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) on Jan. 28 and is under consideration in the Senate.

Interstate Transport Act of 2025 (S 246) – This bill was introduced on Jan. 24 by Sen. Ted Budd (R-NC). It is designed to protect the right of citizens from any state to transport knives to other states without bumping up against state and local prohibitions. Such an act would not be subject to arrest for the possession or transport of a knife without probable cause that the person intends to commit an offense punishable by imprisonment of a year or more. The bipartisan legislation is currently under consideration in the Senate.

Copyright and AI-Generated Images and Videos:

Copyright and AI-Generated Images and Videos

What Businesses Need to Know to Stay Legal

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are reshaping content creation. It is now easier for businesses to produce images and videos for use on websites, social media, and other digital outlets. All this is possible without the traditional hurdles of expensive photoshoots, special design skills, or complex video production. However, as exciting as it is, business owners must pose and confront the question of whether these AI-generated images and videos are legally safe for commercial use from a copyright perspective.

Understanding AI-Generated Content and Copyright

AI-generated content is created by training algorithms with massive datasets of existing images, videos, and text. The AI models then analyze patterns from the training data to generate new content. However, issues arise concerning the ownership of the generated content. Without clear legal guidelines, the ownership of AI-generated images and videos remains a gray area that leaves businesses and individuals vulnerable to potential disputes.

Most jurisdictions, including the United States and the EU, deny copyright protection to work purely generated by AI as it lacks human authorship. The U.S. Copyright Office stated that only content with human creative input can be eligible for protection. In its January 2025 report, the U.S. Copyright Office also states that copyrightability must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Laws differ globally. For instance, while the U.S. copyright office has rejected applications for AI-generated content, the U.K. allows copyright when a significant human intellectual effort guides the output.

Copyright laws do agree that a business risks infringement claims if AI-generated content resembles existing copyrighted material. So far, there has been a surge in the number of copyright lawsuits because of generative AI. A good example is Getty Images sued Stability AI, alleging its Stable Diffusion model copied millions of Getty’s photos without permission.

Generally, despite the efforts made to develop copyright laws for AI output, unlike content created by humans, there still lacks a clear legal framework for ownership and usage rights. For one, laws and legal frameworks struggle to keep up with the speed at which AI technology advances. This means that currently, no definitive, globally recognized legal standards firmly establish the copyright status of AI creations. For a business, although using AI visuals is not inherently legal or forbidden, it is best to be cautious and take due diligence.

Best Practices Every Business Owner Must Keep in Mind

  1. Read the terms of service (TOS)
    Every AI image and video generator has its own unique terms of service. Therefore, it is crucial to examine these terms carefully. Specifically, look for clauses that address issues such as commercial usage, ownership, indemnification, and TOS change policies.
  2. Understand model releases
    This especially applies where the AI-generated images may include recognizable human faces. In the same way that there are rights of publicity and privacy in traditional photography of human models, consider if this also applies to AI-generated faces.
  3. Documentation
    It is crucial to keep a record of each generated AI visual asset. Keep information such as AI platform used, prompts used, date of creation, TOS at the time of creation, and modifications made to the generated visual.
  4. Consider using well-established platforms.
    Although there is no AI platform that offers a 100 percent guarantee of copyright safety, it is safer to lean toward well-established and respected AI generators. Also, platforms trained using licensed or public domain data should be considered.
  5. Adopt the “human-in-the-loop” approach.
    This involves edits such as text overlays, color adjustments, or storyboarding. AI-generated content can be used as a starting point or for inspiration, but it is modified and refined by human designers. This results in a blend of AI assistant and human creative input to potentially mitigate copyright concerns.
  6. Seek expert legal counsel.
    When dealing with content that is central to a business identity, such as branding or major marketing campaigns, it is critical to seek guidance from an attorney specializing in intellectual property law.
  7. Stay informed
    Copyright law in the age of AI is not static; it is actively evolving. It is important, therefore, to commit to staying informed about legal developments, court rulings, and evolving practices. Business content strategies and practices also should be adjusted as the legal landscape changes.

Embrace the Future of Visuals Responsibly and Legally

The transformative power of AI to generate stunning visuals is promising to revolutionize business marketing and communication. However, business owners must approach this technology with a balanced perspective. That is, embracing its potential while avoiding copyright infringement, ensuring ethical content creation, and effectively safeguarding intellectual property assets.

Understanding the Differences Between FCFF and NOPAT

What is NOPATWhen it comes to financial analysis, there are two metrics that internal stakeholders and external users, such as investors and analysts, can use to assist with analyzing a business’s operations.

Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) is used as part of a discount cash flow (DCF) calculation that aids in determining a company’s intrinsic value, helping investors make better informed decisions. This metric provides insight into how much cash flow is available to all funding claimants of the business (be it convertible bond investors, debt holders, and preferred and common stockholders). This is compared to free cash flow to equity (FCFE), which is how much cash flow a business can use if it has zero debt.

While there are many ways to arrive at FCFF, the following is one way to calculate it:

Step 1

Start with Net Operating Profit (NOPAT), which is determined by Earnings Before Interest and Taxes x (1 – Tax Rate)

Step 2

Add Depreciation and Amortization expenses to NOPAT

Step 3

Remove Capital Expenditures

Step 4

Remove Modifications in Net Working Capital

Further Considerations of FCFF Versus FCFE

FCFF assumes there are no payments for interest; nor have any changes in debt been factored in the company’s financial statements. FCFE factors in interest payments and any applicable changes in debt the company may have taken or paid off during the particular accounting time frame. FCFE provides analysts with the ability to determine how efficient a company is and how well (or not) it is at producing cash for equity holders.

Defining NOPAT

NOPAT is a way to see what the company’s operations produce, assuming it has no debt and, accordingly, no outstanding interest expense obligations. It gives analysts and investors an opportunity to look at potential investments with a standardized metric because companies can be seen as having debt and not having debt. It provides easier ability to see if companies can obtain and/or manage debt levels, along with other financial metrics used by investors and analysts.

Along with the already established formula to calculate NOPAT, there’s an alternate formula:

(Net Income + Tax + Interest Expense + Any Non-Operating Gains/Losses] x (1 – Tax Rate)

Operating Earnings = the company’s profits pre interest and taxes (or what the company would earn if it had zero debt, and therefore zero interest expense).

Putting NOPAT in Context

Other important considerations for NOPAT are that it excludes changes in accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable, and inventory. Additionally, it excludes capital expenditures but accounts for amortization and depreciation.

How NOPAT Assists Analysts and Investors

Businesses can use this data to see how this metric drills down on the business’s core functions. It’s a way to determine how profitable or not a business’ core functions are over shorter and longer time frames. It helps businesses determine how efficient a company is against its competitors since it removes debt and tax comparisons.

Analysis is easier for both businesses looking for acquisitions and for investors. NOPAT helps investors determine which companies are most efficient within their sector based on their main functions. It helps remove the “noise” of debt levels and tax situations.

Looking at these two metrics at face value can seem daunting, but after breaking them down and understanding the differences, it’s easier to see how they aid in financial analysis.

6 Tax Filing Tips & Important Info for 2025

As Benjamin Franklin said, there’s only two certainties in life: death and taxes. With the former, you don’t have much control over; however, the latter can be affected. That’s why we’re here to give you some tips and info about filing in our changing landscape.

Remember Key Deadlines

Whether it’s scheduling an alarm on your phone or penning it old school-style on a notepad, it’s critical to keep track of when your taxes are due. Of course, you’ll want to start early. When you do this, you have enough time to gather your info and forms, and make sure you don’t make any mistakes. That said, here are some important dates you’ll want to keep in mind.

  • April 15, 2025: Unless you request an extension, this is the most important deadline for personal income taxes. It’s also the deadline to pay any taxes you owe so you can avoid late payment penalties and interest. If you make quarterly payments, this is also your deadline. Also, there is an exception for South Carolina residents due to Hurricane Helene; their deadline is extended to May 1, 2025.
  • June 17, 2025: If you’re a U.S. citizen living abroad, including military personnel stationed outside the country, this is your deadline. Even though you automatically receive an extra two months without filing an extension, interest still applies to any unpaid tax after April 15.
  • September 15, 2025: If you’re self-employed and earn significant non-wage income, this is the third quarter estimated tax payment deadline for the 2025 tax year. 
  • October 15, 2025: This is your deadline if you filed for an extension in April. If you don’t make this date, you could pay extra fees and penalties.

Child Tax Credits Have Changed

The maximum Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC) amount has increased to $1,700 for each qualifying child. And good news if you live in Puerto Rico: You’ll no longer be required to have three or more qualifying children to claim ACTC. Now you just need one or more.

Standard Deductions Have Increased

For 2024, here’s a snapshot:

  • Single or married filing separately – $14,600
  • Head of household – $21,900
  • Married filing jointly or qualifying surviving spouse – $29,200

For more information about the changes to 2024 taxes, go here to review.

Take Care of Name Changes Pronto

This is for those who have had a name change as a result of marriage or divorce. This also applies if you have people who work for you who have had these changes. Whether it’s you or your employees, contact the Social Security Administration as soon as possible. If names and numbers don’t align, the processing of taxes and refunds will be delayed.

Make Sure ITINS Are Current

That’s Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers. People who have these generally don’t have a Social Security number. If this pertains to you or any of your employees, check the expiration dates; if necessary, renew them as soon as possible.

Create an IRS Online Account

When you create this account, you get secure access to your tax information, including payment history, all your tax records and other important tax data. When everything is digital, you can streamline your prep time, and it can help you identify overlooked deductions or credits.

Filling out your taxes the right way takes time. However, the smartest tactic to ensure your taxes are prepared correctly is to consult a professional tax advisor. No matter how you end up tackling your taxes, it makes good sense to start early and learn as much as you can about IRS tax changes. This way, you’ll have less chance of encountering any hiccups along the way.

Sources

Tax Tips for IRS Filing in 2025 (TY 2024) – The Boom Post

Tax season 2025: All the deadlines taxpayers should know – CBS News

Tax Time Guide 2025: Essentials needed for filing a 2024 tax return | Internal Revenue Service

Defining Net Revenue Retention (NRR)

What is Net Revenue Retention (NRR)The subscription economy, according to Forbes, is expected to reach $1.5 trillion in revenue for businesses. With the potential likely realized this year, it’s vital to understand how it is tracked – and more importantly, how it’s able to be tracked on a separate basis.

Also known as net dollar retention (NDR), this metric calculates the proportion of recurring revenue kept from present clients, including upsells and churn, during a defined time frame. Net revenue retention (NRR) evaluates a business’s potential to keep and increase sales from their present clients.

It looks at how well a company leverages existing customer relationships to increase sales through add-ons, complimentary services, etc. It focuses on the long-term growth of recurring revenue from these relationships. It’s calculated as follows:

NRR = (Starting MRR + Expansion MRR – Churn MRR) ÷ Starting MRR

Based on the following assumptions:

Starting monthly recurring revenue: $200,000

Expansion monthly recurring revenue: $40,000

Churn monthly recurring revenue: $20,000

NRR = ($200,000 + $40,000 – $20,000) / $200,000 = 1.10 or 110%

Based on this result, the company is increasing its revenue from existing customers faster than it’s failing to keep revenue from customer churn, an important metric showing growth.

The following factors impact the formula:

Starting MRR is also referred to as the baseline recurring revenue.

Expansion MRR refers to the added sales from newly added clients, upselling, upgrades, and additions to existing customers’ services.

Churn MRR is the sales missed by customers who stopped or lowered their level and type of services with the company.

Defining a Healthy Revenue Retention Rate

Companies that have a score of more than 100 percent show they’re bringing in more revenue from the existing customer base versus what the company is losing from customer churn. If, however, it’s less than 100 percent, customer satisfaction might be lacking, and customers may either be lost or simply not interested in additional services. Since acquiring new customers is more expensive than keeping current ones, it can lead to reflection on how to improve retention rates.

Journal Entry for Recurring Revenue

Assuming there’s a 12-month contract signed for monthly services, the journal entry would be as follows for a $1,000/monthly payment for a total of $12,000.

  Debit Credit
Cash $12,000  
Unearned Recurring Subscription Income $12,000  

Once the $1,000 subscription income has been earned, the following journal entry would be entered.

  Debit Credit
Unearned Recurring Subscription Income $1,000  
Earned Recurring Subscription Income   $1,000

While each industry and business are different, using this metric can help companies determine if there’s a customer retention problem; then they can start the investigation on how to increase retention for the future.

Sources

https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesfinancecouncil/2023/10/27/the-truth-about-recurring-revenue/

As Tax Season Opens, We Must Stay Alert to Rising Scam Threats

IRS Scam Threats, IRS IRS Scams As tax filing season begins, scammers are ramping up efforts to steal taxpayers’ personal information through increasingly sophisticated schemes. Below, we discuss the latest scam, what to look out for in general, and what to do if you suspect something malicious.

New Scam of the Season

The U.S. Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) recently issued an alert about a prevalent scam involving Economic Impact Payments.

In this scheme, taxpayers receive texts claiming they’re eligible for a $1,400 Economic Impact Payment, requesting personal information and bank details for deposit. While the IRS is indeed processing some legitimate Recovery Rebate Credit payments from 2021 tax returns, they will never request personal information via text or social media. These legitimate payments will be automatically distributed by late January 2025, either through direct deposit or paper check, with official notification letters sent separately.

Detecting Scam in General

The cybersecurity firm Guardio reports a 77 percent increase in IRS-related spam messages, highlighting how scammers exploit taxpayers’ fears of making mistakes on their returns. Common manipulation tactics include urgent messages claiming:

  • Tax return errors requiring immediate action to avoid penalties
  • Unexpected tax refund eligibility requiring verification
  • Account flags demanding immediate information verification to prevent legal action

These fraudulent messages typically contain malicious links designed to steal sensitive information like Social Security numbers, banking details, and payment credentials. They often masquerade as official IRS forms or legitimate tax advisory companies.

Key Warning Signs of Tax Scams:

  • Requests for sensitive personal or financial information
  • Links to suspicious websites (legitimate government sites end in .gov)
  • Misspellings, grammatical errors, or inconsistent formatting
  • Fuzzy or distorted official logos
  • Initial contact via email, phone, text, or social media instead of postal mail

What to Do if You Receive a Suspicious Message

If you receive a suspicious message, don’t engage with it. Never click links or provide personal information to unknown sources. Report potential fraud by forwarding the message to phishing@irs.gov or filing a report with TIGTA. If you’re uncertain about correspondence claiming to be from the IRS, verify it by calling 800-829-1040 or visiting IRS.gov. Your online IRS account will display any official notices mailed to you.

If you’ve accidentally engaged with a scam:

  1. Immediately close any suspicious website tabs
  2. Change passwords for potentially compromised accounts
  3. Contact your bank or credit card provider to monitor for fraudulent activity
  4. Report the incident to the IRS and file an identity theft report with the Federal Trade Commission
  5. Consider notifying local law enforcement

When searching for tax-related information online, only use official sources like IRS.gov or the official IRS app. Be wary of sponsored ads and search results that might lead to fraudulent websites. Consider bookmarking official sites for quick, secure access.

Conclusion

Remember, the IRS will never initiate contact through email, text, or social media. When in doubt, assume it’s a scam and verify through official channels. Keeping your personal information secure requires constant vigilance, especially during tax season when scammers are most active.

 

Beefing Up Laws for Illegal Immigrants and Preparing for Future Disasters

S 5,HR 152,HR 153,HR 164,HR 471, HR 187, HCon Res. 1Laken Riley Act (S 5) – A holdover from the last congressional session, this bill was re-introduced by Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) on Jan. 6. It is similar to a 1996 law, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, that deports illegal immigrants who are found guilty of serious crimes. This new bill enables the government to detain and deport illegals who are arrested for serious crimes or misdemeanors (such as shoplifting), but they do not have to be charged or found guilty. The legislation passed in the Senate on Jan. 20 and the House on Jan. 22, and it is expected to be the first bill signed by the Trump administration.

Federal Disaster Assistance Coordination Act (HR 152) – This legislation would amend the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 to authorize a new study designed to streamline and consolidate data regarding the collection of preliminary damage assessments. It was introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 13, and is currently in the Senate.

Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act (HR 153) – This is a disaster companion bill, also introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3. It would create an online repository for recipients of Federal disaster assistance to meet specific reporting requirements. The bipartisan bill passed in the House on Jan. 14, and its fate also lies with the Senate.

POWER Act of 2025 (HR 164) – Also known as the Promoting Opportunities to Widen Electrical Resilience Act, this non-controversial bill was passed on Jan. 15 under a House procedure called “suspension of the rules.” It would allow Federal agencies to provide essential assistance for the emergency restoration of power and not restrict utility company recipients from also qualifying for hazard mitigation assistance if necessary. The bill amends the previous Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (1988), which details the process for federal government assistance to state and local governments following a major disaster. The bill was introduced by Rep. Valerie Hoyle (D-OR) on Jan. 3 and currently lies with the Senate.

Fix Our Forests Act (HR 471) – The purpose of this bill is to expedite improvements in forest management activities on National Forest public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands. This bipartisan legislation was introduced by Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) on Jan. 16 and passed in the House on Jan. 23. It currently lies with the Senate.

MAPWaters Act of 2025 (HR 187) – This bipartisan bill authorizes the standardization, consolidation, and publication of federal waterways data regarding outdoor recreational uses by the public, as tracked by federal land and water management agencies. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 21, and is under consideration in the Senate.

Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government (HCon Res. 1) – This concurrent resolution was introduced on Jan. 3 by Rep. Michelle Fischbach (R-MN). It is a bipartisan resolution, agreed to by all four majority and minority leaders in both houses, that would allow members of the House and the Senate to assemble at a location outside the District of Columbia if it is in the public interest. The resolution passed in the House on Jan. 3 and currently rests in the Senate.

2025 U.S. Tax Legislation Forecast: What to Expect

2025 U.S. Tax Legislation ForecastAs 2025 unfolds, U.S. tax policy is poised for significant shifts, particularly with a new Republican administration under President Donald Trump. The year ahead will likely see a range of tax reforms, largely driven by the GOP’s objectives and campaign promises. In this article, we’ll explore the major tax policy trends, legislative developments, and administration changes that may shape U.S. tax law in 2025.

The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions

2024 also saw two major Supreme Court decisions with significant tax implications. In the Moore case, the Court ruled narrowly on the issue of wealth taxation, leaving open the possibility of revisiting the question in the future. While wealth tax proposals had gained some traction among Democrats, the Court’s decision, combined with the political climate, suggests that such proposals are unlikely to gain much momentum under the new administration.

The Loper Bright decision, which questioned the deference given to government regulations, could have far-reaching effects on tax policy. The ruling makes it more difficult for agencies like the IRS to issue regulations without clear legislative guidance, potentially leading to more legal challenges to IRS regulations and shifting the balance of power between lawmakers and regulatory agencies.

2025: A New Republican Agenda

With a Republican administration taking office in 2025, tax policy is expected to shift dramatically. President Trump, along with a Republican-controlled Senate and House, will likely push for several key changes to tax law.

One of the primary objectives will be to extend provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that are set to expire. This includes individual tax cuts, corporate rate reductions and changes to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap. The extension of other expiring provisions involving lifetime gift and estate tax exemptions, AMT, child tax credits, and the mortgage interest deduction may also be on the table. Additionally, the GOP is expected to explore new tax cuts, with some lawmakers proposing measures like eliminating taxes on tips, which was promoted during Trump’s election campaign.

On the corporate side, there may be discussions about lowering the effective tax rate through credits and incentives rather than direct reductions to the statutory corporate tax rate. There also could be movement on tax expensing for research and development, as well as other measures to incentivize business investment.

Potential Revenue-Raising Measures

Despite the tax cuts expected to dominate the agenda, there may be some revenue-raising measures included in the GOP’s tax proposals. The focus on reducing deficits could lead to efforts to cut some of the green credits in the Inflation Reduction Act, although these cuts are unlikely to raise significant revenue. There also may be attempts to tighten international tax rules from the TCJA to generate more revenue.

President Trump has also proposed replacing individual income taxes with increases in tariffs, implementing a universal 20 percent tariff across the board, and implementing an additional 50 percent tariff on imports from China.

IRS Funding and Administration Changes

Under the new administration, the IRS is expected to face significant cuts, particularly in its enforcement budget. The $80 billion allocated to the agency in recent years, which was intended to improve taxpayer services and combat tax evasion, is likely to be rolled back. Republicans have expressed strong opposition to the IRS’ expanded powers and are expected to push for a reallocation of those funds toward customer service rather than enforcement.

Additionally, the new administration may replace current IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel, who was appointed during the Biden administration. Trump could nominate a new commissioner, and if this happens, it could spark further debates over the direction of the IRS in the coming years.

Conclusion

2025 promises to be a dynamic year for U.S. tax policy, with significant changes expected under the new administration. Key issues to watch include the fate of the TCJA’s expiring provisions, potential new tax cuts, and ongoing debates over IRS funding and regulations. As the administration works to implement its agenda, there will likely be contentious discussions and compromises on Capitol Hill, setting the stage for a new era of tax policy for the United States.