Author: Service2Client

Enhancing Homebuyer Protections, Wildfire Risks, 911 Response and Domestic Manufacturing

HR 2808, HR 2483, HR 3400, S 306, S 725, S 433Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act (HR 2808) – Introduced by Rep. John Rose (R-TN) on April 10, the House passed this bill on June 23, and the Senate passed it on Aug. 2. Signed into law on Sept. 5, this bipartisan bill prohibits a consumer reporting agency from selling a mortgage applicant’s personal information to other lenders without their explicit consent. The legislation is designed to safeguard homebuyers’ personal financial information and eliminate the frequent bombardment of other lender marketing offers during the financing process underway with the applicant’s existing lender.

SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Reauthorization Act of 2025 (HR 2483) – This bill renews billions of dollars in federal funding for programs responsible for preventing overdoses and further strengthening treatment and recovery services. The renewal of funds to nationwide county programs is timely, given the current behavioral health and substance abuse disorder crises. The bill was introduced by Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-KY) on March 31, passed in the House on June 4 and in the Senate on Sept. 18; it currently awaits signature by the president.

TRAVEL Act of 2025 (HR 3400) – Also known as the Territorial Response and Access to Veterans’ Essential Lifecare Act, the purpose of this bill is to enable VA physicians and specialists to travel to hard-to-reach areas in U.S. territories for up to one year. The Act is designed to help fill critical gaps in VA medical services across the Pacific territories by compensating providers with travel bonuses. The legislation was introduced by Representative Kimberlyn King-Hinds (R-Northern Mariana Islands) on May 14. It passed in the House on Sept. 15 and currently lies with the Senate.

Fire Ready Nation Act of 2025 (S 306) – Introduced by Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) on Jan. 29, this legislation would establish a fire weather program at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The new program would enable scientists to better predict wildfires, fire weather, and fire risk via forecasting, detection, and modeling, as well as respond quickly to prevent devastation to families, homes, and businesses due to wildfires. The legislation was passed in the Senate on Sept. 10 and is now under review in the House.

Enhancing First Response Act (S 725) – This bill was introduced on Feb. 25 by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and passed in the Senate on Sept. 10. The law would reclassify 911 dispatchers as public safety workers from their current role as office and administrative support in the federal Standard Occupational Classification system. In addition, the bill contains provisions to improve access to the 911 call system during major disasters and make the system more resilient against outages and disruptions. The fate of this bipartisan bill now rests in the House.

National Manufacturing Advisory Council Act (S 433) – This Act was introduced by Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) on Feb. 5. It seeks to establish a working group of representatives from industry, labor, and academia to advise Congress on policies and programs to enhance domestic manufacturing despite the challenges of global competition, U.S. supply chain issues, and the current tariff solution. The bipartisan legislationwas  passed unanimously in the Senate on July 14 and is currently under review in the House.

How to Save Money with the Half Rule

What is the Half Rule?What if you could lower your grocery bill without giving up the things you love, fight inflation, and have some money left at the end of the month? Sounds too good to be true? It’s not. It’s the Half Rule. This means cutting the amount of product you use in half and seeing what happens.

Truth is, most of us probably use too much of the things we love. Here are several reasons why:

  • Manufacturers often ask you to use more of the product than you need.
  • You’ve probably gotten used to using a certain amount of a product;
  • And finally, product inflation. Specifically, you might think that if you get pleasure out of something, you might need to use more of it. For instance, why get a tall vanilla latte when you can get a grande, right? But ask yourself: Is it really that much better?

To this end, here are some things you can easily use half of and never miss the other half:

  • Shampoo. Try using half the amount and adding more water, especially if it’s concentrated.
  • Laundry detergent. Try a half cup. A little goes a long way, especially if it’s a small load.
  • Dryer sheets. These are so easy to tear in half.
  • Cooking oil. Use an oil mister instead of pouring it into your pan or skillet.  
  • Restaurant meals. Eat half or a third and save the rest for another meal. Or better yet, split a meal with your partner, friend or work colleague. Bonus: you’ll also save calories.
  • Bagels. Just eat half! Save the other half for your next snack or breakfast.
  • Starbucks order. Try a tall. Or if you get a vente, try a grande. Give it a whirl. See what happens.
  • Glass stovetop cleaner. If you use less, you might have fewer streaks.
  • Tape. When you’re wrapping gifts, give string a try.

When you change a few things here and there, over time, you’ll really see the difference in your bank account. Also, imagine how nice it’ll feel not to have to buy these items so often. That’s a big change in spending.

The Half Rule is not for everything. While it works on so many things, there are some things you cannot to apply it to – like filling up your gas tank or cutting a prescription in half. Never do that.

Overall, it’s a good rule. And when you’re persistent over time, you’ll start to develop a habit – one that will help you see a difference quickly and save you money in the long run. It’s a ripple effect that might expand into other areas of your life. In sum, the Half Rule is so effective, you just might go all in – and stay there.

Sources

“The Half Rule” – A Frugal Hack I Live By

The Silent Threat: How Simple Misconfigurations Are Fueling 2025 Worst Cyberattacks

Simple Misconfigurations Are Fueling 2025 Worst CyberattacksAs organizations invest heavily in next-gen firewalls, AI detection, and threat intelligence, grave cyberattacks have been reported as a result of overlooked misconfigurations. According to the latest statistics, about 23 percent of cloud security incidents are directly connected to misconfigurations. These missteps create easy entry points for cybercriminals that may lead to data breaches, ransomware demands, and financial loss.

What are Misconfigurations?

Misconfigurations are overlooked errors in system setups that create vulnerabilities without the need for hackers to apply advanced hacking techniques. These silent threats are human-driven oversights when configuring software, hardware, or cloud services. Good examples include improperly set permissions in cloud storage, insecure API keys left in code repositories, inadequate security monitoring, and unsecured access points like IoT devices with default passwords.

These issues arise from human error, which accounts for 82 percent of misconfigurations. This is also compounded by today’s cloud era, where businesses depend on cloud platforms, software as a service stacks (SaaS), and AI-driven infrastructure. Many organizations now use multiple providers, and this makes configurations challenging. Rushed deployment also adds to the misconfiguration problem, especially when a thorough audit is not conducted. Unlike malware or phishing scams, misconfigurations remain undetected until exploited.

2025’s Worst Cyberattacks Fueled by Misconfigurations

This year alone, there has been a surge in incidents related to misconfiguration, which is alarming. There were more than 9.5 million cyberattacks in the first half of the year. A good example is the Coinbase breach of May 2025, in which data from more than 70,000 customer records was stolen. This breach is attributed to insider threats exploiting misconfigured permissions.

Recently, cybersecurity researchers revealed a botnet campaign that exploited misconfigured DNS sender policy framework (SPF) records across 20,000 domains and compromised more than 13,000 MikroTik routers. This enabled large-scale spam and spoofing attacks.

In many regions, misconfigured VPN gateways and remote access tools have also contributed to ransomware campaigns. This is through attackers bypassing perimeter defenses by exploiting a misconfigured VPN portal.

IoT weaknesses have also seen entire networks of smart devices compromised, simply because administrators did not change the default login credentials. The entry points ranged from security cameras to industrial sensors, allowing attackers to access more sensitive corporate systems.

Why Organizations Keep Making the Same Mistakes

  • Talent shortage – Many IT teams are stretched and lack sufficient experts to catch every misstep.
  • False confidence in automation – While automated tools are a great help, they are not foolproof. Overreliance on these tools and having a set-and-forget mindset can leave room for security breaches.
  • Velocity over security – This happens when rapid delivery of product features overshadows the slower discipline of security reviews.
  • Siloed responsibility – In many organizations, security is delegated to a separate team instead of being embedded across different units like the development, operations, and business units.
  • Awareness gap – Many teams underestimate how a single overlooked setting, like an open test environment, can escalate into a full-scale breach.

Prevention Strategies and Best Practices

Fortunately, misconfigurations are one of the preventable causes of security breaches. Preventing misconfigurations requires proactive measures that include:

  • Continuous auditing and testing – It is crucial to ensure regular audits and testing of automated tools for configuration management to detect and reduce the window of exposure.
  • Adopt zero-trust models – No device or user should be trusted by default; grant only minimum access where required.
  • Strengthen access controls – Always change default device credentials, partition networks, and enforce MFA across all accounts.
  • Automated detection tools – Use cloud security posture management, compliance-as-code, and drift detection to catch misconfigurations in real time.
  • Cross-functional training and culture – Employee training is vital, as human error accounts for 82 percent of incidents. Security literacy should extend to both technical and non-technical teams.
  • Follow industry guidelines – Align with recognized security frameworks (NIST, ISO, CIS) and CISA’s published guidance on the Top Ten Cybersecurity Misconfigurations. For example, avoid using default configurations, enforce patch management, and properly segment networks.
  • Incident response readiness – Have a well-drilled response playbook to ensure minor disruption in case the defenses fail.

Conclusion

Simple misconfiguration remains a silent enabler of devastating cyberattacks through avoidable errors. Business owners must prioritize configuration hygiene to build resilient digital infrastructures and protect against future threats.

It is a clear lesson that cybersecurity doesn’t always depend on battling sophisticated hackers but rather ensuring they don’t get an easy way in.

Capitalizing Versus Expensing Research and Development

Capitalizing Versus Expensing Research and DevelopmentBased on statistics from the World Bank, the United States government spent 3.59 percent of its 2022 gross domestic product on research and development. While private businesses spend on their own research and development costs, it’s important for businesses to treat these expenditures appropriately.

When it comes to research and development outlays, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) dictate that businesses must expense them during the identical fiscal year as they’re consumed. Accordingly, this creates difficulties for investors and business owners alike in two ways. The first is more uncertain profitability and loss projections. The second is a murkier ability to quantify their rates of return on assets and investments.  

If R&D capitalization is minimal or non-existent by a company, it can imply the business’ total assets (or its total invested capital) doesn’t accurately represent how much has been put into such assets. This will affect the business’ Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC). This illustrates the importance in differences of how businesses treat their R&D expenses – using the balance sheet to capitalize and the income statement to expense.

Accounting Standards

Per International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), research outlays are classified as expenses annually, like GAAP. However, development costs may be capitalized for businesses with assets under incubation for saleable purposes (in other words, the tech/IP is expected to be approved and produce revenue in the future).

One consideration with IFRS is that a portion of research and development costs may be capitalized or recorded as an asset on the business’ balance sheet, instead of classified as an expense on the Profit and Loss Statement. It’s important, though, to understand that judgment is in the eye of the classification as to how commercially viable a product or service will be in the future, potentially causing issues on the company’s financial statements. Since research and development is sporadic, it impacts a business’ profitability. It’s seen in certain sectors, such as consumer discretionary, healthcare, and technology, to highlight a few.

With revenue, cash flow, and profit expected from the long-term investment of research and development, for products or services with a realistic chance, it should be capitalized and not expensed. Investors need to be aware of the differences in how businesses capitalize or expense their research and development spending, since, without additional financial analysis, it’s important to factor in research and development equally. This is because companies that don’t capitalize experience more unstable earnings.

Exploring Capitalization Versus Expensing

To determine the value and to capitalize such assets, analysts must project the asset’s lifespan to produce benefits (over its economic life) and go with that projection for the amortization period.

Amortization life varies between assets and is based on the economic life of the particular asset. Ways to determine the economic life depend on both the asset’s patentability and/or salability. If there’s a pharmaceutical drug with a 20-year patent, it’ll likely have a much longer life than the next mobile device or graphic processing unit (GPU).

Assuming an asset has a life of six years, the business would amortize equally over the six-year time frame. There can be a multitude of amortization approaches, but the straight-line method is used for the capitalized research and development expenses. It assumes the following figures:

$200,000 spent on R&D

$40,000 residual value

Based on the difference of $160,000 and the six-year economic life, each year would result in approximately $26,666 in amortization expense. After six years, the resulting value would be $40,000 in residual value.

Conclusion

Understanding the importance of accounting for R&D outlays is helpful for businesses to maximize investments for competitiveness and financial compliance.

Canceling Government Funding and Expanding Protections for Veterans

hr 4, hr 517, hr1316, s 423, hr1815, s 264, s201Rescissions Act of 2025 (HR 4) – A rescission bill cancels funding previously approved by Congress upon request by the president. Congress has 45 continuous legislative days to enact or reject the proposal, during which time the funds may be temporarily withheld. Introduced by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) on June 6, the House passed this bill on June 12 and the Senate passed it on July 17. Signed into law on July 24, this bill cancels nearly $9 billion in funding for a variety of programs, including foreign aid and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act (HR 517) – On July 24, the president signed into law this bill that allows taxpayers to postpone their filings if their state governor has declared a natural disaster, rather than waiting for the president to declare a federal disaster. The bill was introduced by Rep. David Kustoff on Jan. 16, passed in the House on March 31 and in the Senate on July 10.

Maintaining American Superiority by Improving Export Control Transparency Act (HR 1316) – Introduced by Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX) on Feb. 13, this legislation is designed to crack down on U.S. adversaries acquiring cutting-edge technology. The bill mandates that the Secretary of Commerce submit an annual report to Congress detailing dual-use export license applications and other requests for authorization for the export, re-export, release and in-country transfer of controlled items to arms-embargoed countries such as China, Russia, Iran and North Korea. The legislation was passed in the House on May 5, the Senate on May 22 and was signed into law on Aug. 19.

PRO Veterans Act of 2025 (S 423) – The purpose of this act is to prevent fraud and abuse via increased oversight of the Veterans Affairs Department, including critical skill bonuses paid out to senior executives. Moreover, the bill requires quarterly, in-person briefings to congressional veterans’ committees regarding VA departmental budget shortfalls. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) on Feb. 5, passed in the Senate on April 8 and in the House on July 21. The bill was enacted on Aug. 19.

VA Home Loan Program Reform Act (HR 1815) – This bill was introduced on March 3 by Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-WI), passed in the House on May 19, the Senate on July 15, and signed into law on July 30. The law reauthorizes the VA home loan partial claim and Veterans Affairs Servicing Purchase (VASP) programs. These programs are designed to help distressed veteran homeowners avoid foreclosure by enabling the VA to purchase a portion of indebtedness (25 percent to 30 percent of the unpaid principal balance) of a VA home loan secured by the primary residence of the borrower.

Improving Veterans’ Experience Act of 2025 (S 264) – This bill is meant to improve satisfaction with VA benefits and services by compiling feedback from veterans, families and caregivers. This legislation establishes a Veterans Experience Office (VEO) to manage customer experience initiatives, collect data and coordinate VA departments in order to prevent duplicate efforts and ensure consistent improvements across the board. The bill was introduced on Jan. 28 by Sen. Angus King (I-ME), passed in the Senate on April 8, the House on July 21 and was enacted on Aug. 14.

ACES Act of 2025 (S 201) – This act was introduced by Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) on Jan. 23. It directs the secretary of the VA to study cancer and mortality rates among aviators and aircrews who served in the Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps; and to correlate incidents of cancer among this select group of military personnel. The legislation passed in the Senate on June 3, the House on July 21, and was signed by the president on Aug. 14.

How to Reduce the Burden of IRA Required Minimum Distributions

IRA Required Minimum DistributionsRequired minimum distributions (RMDs) from traditional IRAs and 401(k)s often become a significant tax burden during retirement. As the percentage of your IRA that must be distributed increases each year, many retirees face higher adjusted gross income and increased exposure to stealth taxes. However, with strategic planning, you can transform RMDs from burdens into opportunities.

Timing Your First RMD

The RMD starting age has changed recently: age 72 for those born before 1951, age 73 for those born 1951-1959, and age 75 for those born in 1960 or later. Your first RMD must be taken by April 1 of the year following when you reach the required age.

While you can delay your first RMD until early the following year, most taxpayers should take it in the year they reach the required age. Delaying means you’ll take two RMDs in one calendar year – your delayed first RMD plus that year’s current RMD – potentially pushing you into higher tax brackets and increasing stealth taxes.

Managing Multiple IRAs

If you own several traditional IRAs, you have valuable flexibility under the aggregation rules. First, calculate the RMD for each IRA separately. Then, you can either take distributions from each IRA individually or combine all RMDs and withdraw the total amount from your IRAs in any ratio you choose, even taking the entire amount from just one account.

This flexibility allows you to rebalance your portfolio, draw down smaller accounts, or meet other financial goals. Just ensure that by December 31, your total distributions equal or exceed the aggregate RMD. Note that inherited IRAs and employer plans like 401(k)s cannot be aggregated and must have their RMDs calculated and taken separately.

Charitable Giving Strategy

One of the most tax-efficient strategies is using qualified charitable distributions (QCDs). If you’re over 70½ and make charitable gifts, taking your RMD as a QCD can reduce your taxable income while satisfying the distribution requirement. This strategy often provides better tax benefits than taking a distribution and then making a separate charitable deduction.

Account Structure Optimization

The tax law allows you to consolidate or split IRAs without tax consequences using direct trustee-to-trustee transfers. Some people prefer multiple IRAs for beneficiary planning, different investment strategies or to keep 401(k) rollover money separate. Others find multiple accounts harder to manage and worry about unequal performance affecting beneficiaries differently.

Consider your specific situation: if you have a qualified longevity annuity contract (QLAC) that delays RMDs until age 85, managing it in a separate IRA might be easier.

In-Kind Distributions

You don’t need to sell assets to generate cash for RMDs. Instead, you can make in-kind distributions by transferring securities directly from your IRA to a taxable account. This preserves your asset allocation and can be particularly advantageous when assets have temporarily declined in value.

With in-kind distributions, the asset’s value on the distribution date becomes your new tax basis. If you believe a depressed asset will recover, distributing it allows the ordinary income tax on the current low value while future appreciation becomes tax-advantaged long-term capital gains. This strategy is also helpful for unconventional assets like real estate or small business interests that are difficult to sell in portions.

Distribution Timing and Amount

You can take RMDs anytime during the year. Some prefer monthly distributions for regular cash flow, others take distributions early to ensure compliance, and some wait until year-end to maximize tax deferral and delay estimated tax payments.

Remember that RMDs are minimums – you can always take more. Consider larger distributions in years when your tax rate is unusually low due to higher deductions or lower income. This reduces future RMDs when your tax rate might be higher.

Conclusion

Strategic RMD planning can significantly reduce their tax impact. By understanding timing options, leveraging aggregation rules, using charitable strategies, optimizing account structures, considering in-kind distributions and timing distributions strategically, you can turn required distributions into opportunities for smart tax and retirement planning.

Beyond the Hype: A Strategic Blueprint for AI Investment in 2025 and Beyond

AI Investment in 2025Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the most talked-about technologies today. It has taken a shift from the broad general-purpose tools to specialized innovations that promise real impact. AI is dominating headlines with investor pitches. There has also been a surge in startups promising AI-powered solutions. However, some businesses have already adopted and invested millions into AI projects with little return. As AI advances, business owners and investors need to stop chasing the latest headlines and consider how to best integrate AI to create lasting value.

Understanding the AI Investment Landscape in 2025

Since the AI breakout, it has advanced dramatically. There are three forces that are reshaping the investment and adoption of AI.

  1. Maturation of Foundation Models
    The large language models (LLMs) are now cheaper and faster. They are also customizable. This means that businesses no longer need to build from scratch and can just adapt existing models in their industry.
  2. Regulations and Accountability
    Governments are tightening frameworks around data privacy, transparency, and responsible AI. Compliance has become a key competitive differentiator.
  3. Sector-Specific Applications
    Advancements in AI have given way to specialized use cases. For example, fintech AI can track fraud, while manufacturing AI optimizes the supply chain.

The AI Hype Cycle

According to Gartner’s 2025 “Hype Cycle for Artificial Intelligence.” AI technologies move through predictable stages. These include the innovation trigger, peak of inflated expectations, trough of disillusionment, slope of enlightenment, and plateau of productivity. Between 2023 and 2024, generative AI dominated the headlines. It has now entered the trough of disillusionment as organizations confront their limitations, governance risks, and the difficulty of proving ROI. However, this is not to be seen as a setback, but rather a turning point as businesses shift focus from experimentation to scaling reasonably. Investment is now focused on foundational enablers such as ready data, ModelOps for lifecycle management, and AI agents. By 2025, businesses will be realizing that quick wins are harder than expected. On the bright side, businesses have an opportunity to build sustainable systems that offer measurable business value.

Lessons Learned from the First Wave of AI Adoption

The promises that came with AI led some businesses to invest heavily. This resulted in several mistakes:

  • Chasing innovation over value
    Many businesses rushed to invest in AI-powered projects like chatbots without linking them to actual business goals. For instance, customers have raised concerns about frustration with bank AI bots that confuse rather than help customers, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
  • Falling for AI hype
    Some businesses invested in companies branding themselves as AI-driven, even when the solutions offered relied on basic automation.
  • Ignoring integration
    Failing to consider that AI is not a plug-and-play solution. This saw some early adopters underestimating the cultural, technical, and operational changes required to integrate AI into workflows.

A Strategic Blueprint for AI Investment

For businesses to invest wisely:

  1. Start with the problem, not the tool
    Instead of shopping for tools to adopt, a business should first ponder what problem it wants to solve. This means clearly defining the problem to solve, such as personalizing marketing campaigns or predicting supply shortages. Clarifying a problem ensures the AI investment is focused and not an experiment.
  2. Build a portfolio approach
    Borrowing from how investors diversify portfolios, a business should also diversify its AI initiatives. They can do this by balancing short-term projects, such as automating repetitive tasks, with long-term projects like predictive analytics. This is to ensure there is a steady return on investment.
  3. Prioritize responsible and compliant AI
    Reputation is crucial, and businesses should avoid mishandling customer data. To do this, companies must invest in compliance, transparency, and explainability as part of their AI strategy.
  4. Invest in people, not just technology
    AI does not replace talent. Companies should invest in training and upskilling their workforce. This prepares employees to work well with the new technology to ensure adoption is smooth and effective.
  5. Build scalable infrastructure
    Even with the most advanced AI model, failing to have the right foundation will result in unsuccessful implementation. The lesson? Companies must invest in flexible systems that can grow with them.

Conclusion

AI is no longer a futuristic concept. It is a business reality. Adopting AI alone is not enough, and businesses need to do it wisely. Businesses should refrain from jumping on the latest trends. Instead, make strategic choices that align with long-term goals. The focus should be on the problems to be solved and not the tools. 

5 Myths About Life Insurance

Myths About Life InsuranceLife insurance is something most of us don’t want to talk about. But the truth is, no one gets out of life alive. So, it might make sense to face it now so that when you really need it, it’s there. Before you start looking for a life insurance policy, let’s dispel some of the untruths you might have heard.

Myth #1: It’s too expensive. According to a recent survey by Life Insurance Marketing and Research Association (LIMRA), 52 percent of people thought it was too expensive to have or get more of. And how did they come to this conclusion? They based this on their “gut instinct,” or a “wild guess.” Truth is, it’s more affordable than you think and varies from person to person. In fact, the estimated yearly cost of a $500,000, 30-year term insurance policy for a healthy 30-year-old, non-smoking female is $316.

Myth #2: It’s a pain to apply. Not true. Thanks to the pandemic, which caused us to eliminate or reduce human interactions (like getting a doctor’s exam for term policies), you can apply online. These days, all you have to do is answer a few questions on your phone. Easy peasy.

Myth #3: My company’s policy is enough. Maybe. The coverage you have might not be enough for your family. Here are some facts. The median workplace life insurance coverage is either just a flat sum of $20,000 or one year’s salary.Of U.S. households that rely on workplace life insurance coverage, 44 percent say their families would struggle financially in less than six months should a wage earner die unexpectedly. So, what to do? A simple guideline is this: Aim for 10 to 12 times your annual salary and bonus, but people who are younger (farther away from retirement) might need more. Folks closer to retirement might need less.

Myth #4: I only need coverage if I’m working. If you’re not employed outside the home – like if you’re a stay-at-home mom – it’s still important to consider life insurance. Typically, life insurance is considered a replacement for lost income. If something happens to the non-breadwinner, it could also be necessary to pay for childcare and household work in your absence. The most important thing is to plan your coverage together with your family in mind so that you’re both in the best position possible should one of you pass away.

Myth #5: I don’t need life insurance until I’m older or become a parent. Nope. In fact, not only do you not have to be a parent, but your beneficiary could also be your partner or anyone else who relies on you. And you can change your beneficiaries (you can have more than one), should things change. Plus, if you apply for life insurance earlier in life, you’ll save money on premiums. Why? Because one thing that factors into how much you pay – or qualify for coverage at all – is your health. As you get older, your risk for developing health issues increases. According to LIMRA, 40 percent of those who have policies wish they’d bought them when they were younger.

In the end, you’ll want to take care of those who depend on you – and those you love. That’s why knowing the truth about life insurance matters.

Sources

Myths about life insurance | Fidelity

How to Evaluate Accounts Receivables

Reconcile Accounts Receivable, Evaluate Accounts ReceivableAccording to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, collection agencies saw $16.28 billion in revenue in 2019. While revenues have declined somewhat in recent years, unpaid invoices are still big business. Accounts receivable aging reports can help companies identify and mitigate unpaid invoices and potentially lower a business’ need to send unpaid invoices to collection agencies.

An accounts receivable aging report analyzes how well a company manages its accounts receivables (AR) and identifies the level of any abnormalities. It looks at receivables based on their age; specifically, the time the invoice has been unpaid and outstanding. Then, once receivables have been analyzed for non-payment based on different time frames, the business can determine whether to follow up with the customer, send it to collections, or write the invoice off.

Whether it’s created manually through a spreadsheet or done in conjunction with accounting or billing software, either way the AR aging report takes data from the company’s accounts receivable ledger. The following is a general overview of how to create this report:

Step 1: Aggregate invoices and determine if any credit memos or outstanding adjustments on outstanding invoices need to be addressed first.

Step 2: Create time frames for the invoices, be it buckets such as: 1. 0-30 days. 2. 31-60 days. 3. 60+ days. These can be referred to as “aging buckets” to categorize the invoices.

Step 3: Ensure fields for customer information, invoice details, invoice amounts, notes, etc., are ready for the information to flow into.

Step 4: Calculate unpaid invoice balances and group them by customer and time frame.

While this is only an example and can be modified based upon the company’s needs, it’s a starting point for further analysis. From there, along with updating the report on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis, the company can identify how to improve its cash position by determining its weak points.

One important consideration, especially for businesses with high levels of old, uncollected receivables, is that the company’s collection practices can be re-evaluated more effectively. The analysis can show that some customers take too long, and the company needs to be more proactive in following up with them sooner. It can also convey the need to incentivize their collections with early payment discounts.

This data also enables a company to identify customers who have outstanding payments and assess the associated risk to the company’s credit rating. Especially for publicly traded companies, and even for private equity investment evaluations, investors can see how competitive or not their credit rating is compared to similar companies in the same industry. When analyzing customers, it may be necessary to tighten terms or simply stop doing business with the customer.

Companies can offer pre- or early payment terms, with discounts available to customers who pay their invoices upon receipt or within a certain time frame. During challenging conditions for a particular sector or for the economy overall, businesses can set up payment plans to maintain positive relations with certain customers.

While there’s no perfect accounts receivable aging report, an effective one will organize, identify, and reduce the likelihood of increasing numbers of unpaid invoices.

Sources

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/REVEF56144ALLEST

Restricted Stock Units: 5 Essential Tax and Financial Planning Strategies

Restricted Stock Units, RSUsReceiving restricted stock units (RSUs) may seem straightforward, but the tax and financial planning complexities can catch many employees off guard. Understanding these key strategies might help you avoid costly mistakes and optimize your financial outcomes.

1. Manage Tax Withholding at Vesting

The most common pitfall with RSUs is inadequate tax withholding when shares vest. Companies typically withhold taxes at a flat 22 percent rate for federal taxes (37 percent for amounts over $1 million annually), but this often falls short of your actual tax obligation. Financial planners identify this as the biggest issue they see with RSU clients. Many are surprised by large tax bills because the withholding didn’t cover their full liability.

Managing proper tax withholding is often the primary focus of RSU planning. The challenge becomes even more complex when stock prices are volatile, making it difficult to predict exact tax obligations.

Higher RSU income increases the likelihood of under-withholding. When shares can’t be sold to cover additional taxes, alternative payment methods must be planned. Quarterly estimated taxes are one option, though this becomes complicated when the current year income differs significantly from the prior year.

The most effective approach is to conduct quarterly tax projections or work with a CPA to maintain compliance with safe harbor requirements for federal taxes throughout the year.

2. Comprehensive RSU Planning Questions

While RSUs appear simpler than stock options due to their fixed vesting schedules, this perception can be misleading. Financial advisors warn that numerous organizational details can create problems without proper planning.

Key planning considerations include potential state moves during vesting periods, which trigger mobility tax issues, and coordination with ESPP purchases and stock option exercises to avoid wash sale complications. Essential questions for RSU planning include understanding personal goals, assessing wealth concentration levels, determining how much needs to be diversified, ensuring spouse awareness of concentration risks, analyzing the ratio of vested to unvested shares, tracking upcoming vests and trading windows, and evaluating prior year income impacts.

A critical concern is spousal awareness of company stock concentration. Financial planners frequently encounter situations where busy tech employees accumulate significant wealth while their spouses remain unaware that their entire financial security depends on one company’s stock performance.

3. Reduce Taxable Income During Vesting Years

Beyond harvesting capital losses, several strategies can reduce your overall tax burden in years when RSUs vest. These include maximizing 401(k) deferrals, funding Health Savings Accounts, participating in nonqualified deferred compensation plans if available, and donating appreciated company stock to donor-advised funds to exceed standard deduction thresholds.

4. The Hold Versus Sell Decision

Once RSUs vest and you own the shares, deciding whether to hold or sell becomes crucial. Financial advisors routinely recommend selling RSU shares immediately upon vesting, before significant price fluctuations occur. This recommendation is particularly strong for clients already holding substantial company stock positions, as additional concentration increases unnecessary risk.

Many clients choose to sell immediately and deploy proceeds toward other financial goals. This approach helps diversify their overall portfolio and reduces company-specific risk.

5. Navigate Trading Windows

RSU selling plans must account for company trading windows, which dictate when employees can sell shares. Understanding these restrictions is essential for effective RSU management.

When advisors recommend selling RSUs at vesting, they don’t mean selling on the exact vesting date. Instead, they mean selling when trading windows permit, typically after earnings calls. These windows usually last four to six weeks, and while exact dates can’t be predicted far in advance, historical patterns provide reasonable estimates.

Financial planners coordinate clients’ RSU vesting schedules with anticipated trading windows to develop realistic selling strategies. This coordination ensures clients can execute their plans within company restrictions while maintaining compliance with insider trading rules and any existing 10b5-1 trading plans.

Conclusion

Proper RSU planning requires understanding these interconnected elements and developing strategies that align with your broader financial goals while managing tax implications effectively.