Year: 2025

Understanding The Q Ratio

Understanding The Q Ratio, What is Tobin's Q RatioWhen it comes to evaluating a business, there are many ways to perform a valuation. One way to do so is to use the Q Ratio. Known as Tobin’s Q Ratio or simply the Q Ratio, this method looks at the proportion between the values of a physical asset and its replacement cost. Developed by Nobel laureate economist James Tobin, this ratio presumes a single company; for public investors, if asset values can be estimated, the company’s market value of a publicly traded company may be approximately estimated.

The original formula is as follows:

Q Ratio = Market Value of Assets / Replacement Cost of Capital

While this formula is the original iteration, approximating an asset’s replacement value is complicated and oftentimes not 100 percent realistic to analyze. The more realistic way it’s calculated is by using book values in lieu of the asset’s replacement costs. The new way to calculate it is as follows:

Q Ratio = (Equity Market Value + Liabilities’ Market Value) / (Equity Book Value + Liabilities’ Market Value)

When it comes to calculating the overall market’s Q Ratio:

Q Ratio = Value of the Stock Market / Corporate Net Worth

Putting the Q Ratio in Practice

Essentially, it’s used to value a company. Once calculated, the Q Ratio provides internal stakeholders and outside investors with one way to evaluate a company.

Above 1

If the Q Ratio is more than 1, the business’ market value is higher than its booked assets. It means a company’s valuation is overestimated in the eyes of the market since there is some portion of the company’s assets that are either not documented or valued fully. When the Q Ratio is above 1, a business’ earnings are worth more than replacement costs for the assets. At this level, entrepreneurs are incentivized to develop a competitor business to gain market share and financial gain.

Equal to 1

When the Q Ratio equals 1, it implies the market sees the company’s assets as valued fairly.

Below 1

At this level, a business’ assets are worth more than fair market value, establishing the business as undervalued. Investors with enough assets can purchase the company in question, either via shares if publicly traded or outright if a private company, versus trying to create a competitor company to siphon value away from it.

Further Consideration

When it comes to the calculated Q Ratio, it’s important to keep it in context. While accountants can be precise with many things during preparation, when it comes to market forces and intangible assets, analysts need to use their judgment. Investors and market forces can create hyperbole for a business’ value that can’t be quantified and recorded by accountants. Stock analysts’ perspectives on a business’ prospects or rumors regarding future performance can modulate the present, dynamic valuation of the company.

Another consideration is how to document and gauge intangible assets like intellectual property and goodwill. While accountants can approximate IP or goodwill, it’s not an exact science.

Thus, when businesses use the Q Ratio to value their own company or one they consider purchasing, investors must take the Q Ratio as part of a holistic valuation approach.

The Hidden Tax Trap Keeping America’s Housing Market Frozen

capital gains taxes on your home America’s housing crisis has reached a breaking point. With median home prices soaring past $400,000, the National Association of Home Builders reports that 60 percent of U.S. households can’t even afford a $300,000 home. The math has become impossible for most American families.

While we often blame high mortgage rates, restrictive zoning laws and rising construction costs for the housing shortage, there’s another culprit hiding in plain sight: a decades-old tax rule that’s trapping millions of homeowners in houses they’d rather leave.

The $500,000 Problem

When Congress overhauled capital gains taxes on home sales in 1997, they created what seemed like a generous benefit: homeowners could exclude up to $250,000 in profits from taxes ($500,000 for married couples) when selling their primary residence. This replaced a complex system of rollovers and age-based exemptions with something simpler and cleaner.

But Congress made one critical mistake – they never adjusted these limits for inflation or housing price growth.

Nearly three decades later, these same dollar amounts remain frozen in time, even as home values have skyrocketed. According to new research from Moody’s Analytics, if the exclusion had kept pace with home prices, it would now stand at $885,000 for singles and $1,775,000 for couples. Even adjusting for general inflation alone would double today’s limits.

The Senior Squeeze

This outdated tax rule hits empty-nesters particularly hard. Consider this: nearly 6 million households headed by seniors live in homes larger than 2,500 square feet. Many would gladly downsize to something more manageable, but selling could trigger six-figure tax bills on homes they’ve owned for decades.

The result? They stay put, waiting until death when their heirs can inherit the property with a stepped-up basis that erases all capital gains. Meanwhile, these oversized homes remain off the market, unavailable to growing families who desperately need the space.

Moody’s Analytics estimates these “overhoused” seniors spend $3,000 to $5,000 more annually on maintenance, utilities and property taxes than they would in smaller homes – adding up to $20 billion to 30 billion in unnecessary costs nationwide each year.

An Unexpected Burden on the Middle Class

Surprisingly, this tax burden doesn’t primarily affect the wealthy. Middle-class homeowners in expensive markets like California and Massachusetts face steep tax bills despite modest incomes. Widows face their own challenges, having just two years after a spouse’s death to sell while maintaining the full $500,000 exclusion (though they do receive a partial step-up in basis on their late spouse’s share).

An IRS study revealed a startling fact: 20 percent to 25 percent of capital gains taxes collected under current rules come from filers earning less than $20,000 annually. Meanwhile, wealthier homeowners often have the resources and flexibility to structure sales strategically, minimizing their tax exposure.

The Housing Market Ripple Effect

This tax trap creates a cascade of problems. Young families remain stuck in starter homes. First-time buyers face even fiercer competition for limited inventory. Labor mobility suffers as workers can’t relocate to areas with better job opportunities. The entire housing ecosystem becomes frozen.

The shortage is stark: monthly active listings only climbed back above 1 million in May, according to realtor.com. Before the pandemic, that number hadn’t dropped below that threshold since at least 2016.

Solutions on the Table

Congress is considering two approaches to break this logjam. One would be to double the current exclusions and index them to inflation going forward. The more radical proposal would eliminate the cap entirely.

The Double-Edged Sword

Any change comes with risks. Moody’s Analytics warns that while updating these limits could unlock hundreds of thousands of homes and boost inventory, it might also intensify competition at the lower end of the market as downsizing seniors compete with first-time buyers for the same properties. It could also make housing an even more attractive tax shelter, which would ultimately drive prices higher.

The Path Forward

The paradox is clear: raising or eliminating the capital gains exclusion could provide immediate relief to millions of homeowners trapped by tax considerations. It could inject a much-needed supply into a starved market. But without careful implementation, it could just as easily fuel another round of price increases, leaving affordability as elusive as ever.

A Look at the Nonaccrual Experience Method

Nonaccrual Experience MethodWhen it comes to running a business, having outstanding invoices that turn into uncollectible receivables or simply bad debt is a fact of life. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has a safe harbor that permits businesses to reduce consideration of such bad debt from taxation if it qualifies. However, understanding how to determine if a business is eligible is essential to making the most of it when a business files its taxes.

Defining the Nonaccrual Experience Method (NAE)

When businesses perform a service, they expect to be paid. However, they sometimes have unpaid invoices that are uncollectible. One provision within the IRS’s Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is that of the nonaccrual experience method (NAE) and how it intersects with bad debts.

How It Works      

Once a company sees bad debt in its system after customers fail to pay their invoices, it calculates the amounts it projects it won’t be able to collect. Projecting bad debt is accomplished by the company looking at previous experiences with its payees. It’s important to note that this accounting is used by businesses for only a portion of their projected uncollectable customer bad debt; businesses similarly project the remaining percentage they expect to collect from outstanding invoices in the future.   

One important step for businesses to determine their eligibility for relief from the accrual segment of uncollectible revenue, per the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), is by determining their industry classification. Sample industries include legal professionals, engineers, performance art professionals, architects, and actuaries.

It’s important to note that if businesses don’t use this method, they may charge off such debts. Charge-offs are when a company writes the debt off its balance sheet and expenses the uncollectible funds on the income statement. Companies must also adhere to the following criteria to take advantage of the safe harbor:

  • The company must currently use the accrual method of accounting when recording revenues, and not the cash method to account for revenue.
  • The company, in a single year, within the past 36 months, has earned up to, but no more than $5 million in gross receipts.

IRS Guidance

Beginning in September 2011, the Internal Revenue Service permitted taxpayers to use the NAE method to determine applicability by applying a factor of 95 percent to their allowance for bad debts via their past 60 months of financial documents. This permits businesses to exclude qualifying uncollectible revenues from their taxable income, which is beneficial for lowering the amount of taxes owed. It is often easier for NAE-specific designated industries to qualify; however, only companies with the appropriate amount of historical information to substantiate are eligible.

Further Considerations and Conclusion

One example of this safe harbor includes having financial information that’s expertly tracked for the past 60 months via financial statements. If the company can’t substantiate it, they won’t be able to qualify. Similarly, eligible services provided or the resulting receivables that have interest and/or financial penalties attached are ineligible.

When it comes to navigating the IRS code, the NAE can provide another way for eligible companies to maximize filings and tax obligations.

Enhancing Homebuyer Protections, Wildfire Risks, 911 Response and Domestic Manufacturing

HR 2808, HR 2483, HR 3400, S 306, S 725, S 433Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act (HR 2808) – Introduced by Rep. John Rose (R-TN) on April 10, the House passed this bill on June 23, and the Senate passed it on Aug. 2. Signed into law on Sept. 5, this bipartisan bill prohibits a consumer reporting agency from selling a mortgage applicant’s personal information to other lenders without their explicit consent. The legislation is designed to safeguard homebuyers’ personal financial information and eliminate the frequent bombardment of other lender marketing offers during the financing process underway with the applicant’s existing lender.

SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Reauthorization Act of 2025 (HR 2483) – This bill renews billions of dollars in federal funding for programs responsible for preventing overdoses and further strengthening treatment and recovery services. The renewal of funds to nationwide county programs is timely, given the current behavioral health and substance abuse disorder crises. The bill was introduced by Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-KY) on March 31, passed in the House on June 4 and in the Senate on Sept. 18; it currently awaits signature by the president.

TRAVEL Act of 2025 (HR 3400) – Also known as the Territorial Response and Access to Veterans’ Essential Lifecare Act, the purpose of this bill is to enable VA physicians and specialists to travel to hard-to-reach areas in U.S. territories for up to one year. The Act is designed to help fill critical gaps in VA medical services across the Pacific territories by compensating providers with travel bonuses. The legislation was introduced by Representative Kimberlyn King-Hinds (R-Northern Mariana Islands) on May 14. It passed in the House on Sept. 15 and currently lies with the Senate.

Fire Ready Nation Act of 2025 (S 306) – Introduced by Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) on Jan. 29, this legislation would establish a fire weather program at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The new program would enable scientists to better predict wildfires, fire weather, and fire risk via forecasting, detection, and modeling, as well as respond quickly to prevent devastation to families, homes, and businesses due to wildfires. The legislation was passed in the Senate on Sept. 10 and is now under review in the House.

Enhancing First Response Act (S 725) – This bill was introduced on Feb. 25 by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and passed in the Senate on Sept. 10. The law would reclassify 911 dispatchers as public safety workers from their current role as office and administrative support in the federal Standard Occupational Classification system. In addition, the bill contains provisions to improve access to the 911 call system during major disasters and make the system more resilient against outages and disruptions. The fate of this bipartisan bill now rests in the House.

National Manufacturing Advisory Council Act (S 433) – This Act was introduced by Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) on Feb. 5. It seeks to establish a working group of representatives from industry, labor, and academia to advise Congress on policies and programs to enhance domestic manufacturing despite the challenges of global competition, U.S. supply chain issues, and the current tariff solution. The bipartisan legislationwas  passed unanimously in the Senate on July 14 and is currently under review in the House.

The Silent Threat: How Simple Misconfigurations Are Fueling 2025 Worst Cyberattacks

Simple Misconfigurations Are Fueling 2025 Worst CyberattacksAs organizations invest heavily in next-gen firewalls, AI detection, and threat intelligence, grave cyberattacks have been reported as a result of overlooked misconfigurations. According to the latest statistics, about 23 percent of cloud security incidents are directly connected to misconfigurations. These missteps create easy entry points for cybercriminals that may lead to data breaches, ransomware demands, and financial loss.

What are Misconfigurations?

Misconfigurations are overlooked errors in system setups that create vulnerabilities without the need for hackers to apply advanced hacking techniques. These silent threats are human-driven oversights when configuring software, hardware, or cloud services. Good examples include improperly set permissions in cloud storage, insecure API keys left in code repositories, inadequate security monitoring, and unsecured access points like IoT devices with default passwords.

These issues arise from human error, which accounts for 82 percent of misconfigurations. This is also compounded by today’s cloud era, where businesses depend on cloud platforms, software as a service stacks (SaaS), and AI-driven infrastructure. Many organizations now use multiple providers, and this makes configurations challenging. Rushed deployment also adds to the misconfiguration problem, especially when a thorough audit is not conducted. Unlike malware or phishing scams, misconfigurations remain undetected until exploited.

2025’s Worst Cyberattacks Fueled by Misconfigurations

This year alone, there has been a surge in incidents related to misconfiguration, which is alarming. There were more than 9.5 million cyberattacks in the first half of the year. A good example is the Coinbase breach of May 2025, in which data from more than 70,000 customer records was stolen. This breach is attributed to insider threats exploiting misconfigured permissions.

Recently, cybersecurity researchers revealed a botnet campaign that exploited misconfigured DNS sender policy framework (SPF) records across 20,000 domains and compromised more than 13,000 MikroTik routers. This enabled large-scale spam and spoofing attacks.

In many regions, misconfigured VPN gateways and remote access tools have also contributed to ransomware campaigns. This is through attackers bypassing perimeter defenses by exploiting a misconfigured VPN portal.

IoT weaknesses have also seen entire networks of smart devices compromised, simply because administrators did not change the default login credentials. The entry points ranged from security cameras to industrial sensors, allowing attackers to access more sensitive corporate systems.

Why Organizations Keep Making the Same Mistakes

  • Talent shortage – Many IT teams are stretched and lack sufficient experts to catch every misstep.
  • False confidence in automation – While automated tools are a great help, they are not foolproof. Overreliance on these tools and having a set-and-forget mindset can leave room for security breaches.
  • Velocity over security – This happens when rapid delivery of product features overshadows the slower discipline of security reviews.
  • Siloed responsibility – In many organizations, security is delegated to a separate team instead of being embedded across different units like the development, operations, and business units.
  • Awareness gap – Many teams underestimate how a single overlooked setting, like an open test environment, can escalate into a full-scale breach.

Prevention Strategies and Best Practices

Fortunately, misconfigurations are one of the preventable causes of security breaches. Preventing misconfigurations requires proactive measures that include:

  • Continuous auditing and testing – It is crucial to ensure regular audits and testing of automated tools for configuration management to detect and reduce the window of exposure.
  • Adopt zero-trust models – No device or user should be trusted by default; grant only minimum access where required.
  • Strengthen access controls – Always change default device credentials, partition networks, and enforce MFA across all accounts.
  • Automated detection tools – Use cloud security posture management, compliance-as-code, and drift detection to catch misconfigurations in real time.
  • Cross-functional training and culture – Employee training is vital, as human error accounts for 82 percent of incidents. Security literacy should extend to both technical and non-technical teams.
  • Follow industry guidelines – Align with recognized security frameworks (NIST, ISO, CIS) and CISA’s published guidance on the Top Ten Cybersecurity Misconfigurations. For example, avoid using default configurations, enforce patch management, and properly segment networks.
  • Incident response readiness – Have a well-drilled response playbook to ensure minor disruption in case the defenses fail.

Conclusion

Simple misconfiguration remains a silent enabler of devastating cyberattacks through avoidable errors. Business owners must prioritize configuration hygiene to build resilient digital infrastructures and protect against future threats.

It is a clear lesson that cybersecurity doesn’t always depend on battling sophisticated hackers but rather ensuring they don’t get an easy way in.

How to Save Money with the Half Rule

What is the Half Rule?What if you could lower your grocery bill without giving up the things you love, fight inflation, and have some money left at the end of the month? Sounds too good to be true? It’s not. It’s the Half Rule. This means cutting the amount of product you use in half and seeing what happens.

Truth is, most of us probably use too much of the things we love. Here are several reasons why:

  • Manufacturers often ask you to use more of the product than you need.
  • You’ve probably gotten used to using a certain amount of a product;
  • And finally, product inflation. Specifically, you might think that if you get pleasure out of something, you might need to use more of it. For instance, why get a tall vanilla latte when you can get a grande, right? But ask yourself: Is it really that much better?

To this end, here are some things you can easily use half of and never miss the other half:

  • Shampoo. Try using half the amount and adding more water, especially if it’s concentrated.
  • Laundry detergent. Try a half cup. A little goes a long way, especially if it’s a small load.
  • Dryer sheets. These are so easy to tear in half.
  • Cooking oil. Use an oil mister instead of pouring it into your pan or skillet.  
  • Restaurant meals. Eat half or a third and save the rest for another meal. Or better yet, split a meal with your partner, friend or work colleague. Bonus: you’ll also save calories.
  • Bagels. Just eat half! Save the other half for your next snack or breakfast.
  • Starbucks order. Try a tall. Or if you get a vente, try a grande. Give it a whirl. See what happens.
  • Glass stovetop cleaner. If you use less, you might have fewer streaks.
  • Tape. When you’re wrapping gifts, give string a try.

When you change a few things here and there, over time, you’ll really see the difference in your bank account. Also, imagine how nice it’ll feel not to have to buy these items so often. That’s a big change in spending.

The Half Rule is not for everything. While it works on so many things, there are some things you cannot to apply it to – like filling up your gas tank or cutting a prescription in half. Never do that.

Overall, it’s a good rule. And when you’re persistent over time, you’ll start to develop a habit – one that will help you see a difference quickly and save you money in the long run. It’s a ripple effect that might expand into other areas of your life. In sum, the Half Rule is so effective, you just might go all in – and stay there.

Sources

“The Half Rule” – A Frugal Hack I Live By

Understanding Contribution Margin After Marketing

Contribution Margin After Marketing (CMAM)Contribution margin after marketing (CMAM) measures how much money is generated per unit retailed after factoring in a company’s variable costs, along with marketing costs.

It’s analogous with contribution margin, however, a business must factor in marketing costs the company experiences when publicizing a good to likely consumers with details on the business’ wares. This metric determines how well net sales can satisfy expense obligations and what percentage of net sales may remain to satisfy fixed expenses.

Comparing Variable Versus Fixed Costs

Variable costs, as the name implies, are expenses that rise and fall according to output quantities. Fixed costs, conversely, are expenses that don’t change despite variation of production quantities. Understanding these concepts is helpful when calculating CMAM to see how both types of expenses impact the different calculations.

CMAM = Sales Revenue – Variable Costs – Marketing Expense

It can also be determined on a per-unit basis to help a business understand how a single product unit contributes to the company’s comprehensive profits. One can calculate the CMPU (contribution margin per unit) as follows to provide a more granular analysis:

CMAM/Unit = Sales Revenue/Unit – Variable Expenses/Unit – Marketing Expense/Unit

What separates variable costs (including marketing expenses) from the sales revenue is CMAM. The balance is profit along with fixed costs. To calculate if a business saw a net loss or profit, the formula is:

Net Operating Profit = CMAM – fixed costs

If a profit is reported after subtracting variable costs, costs to market, plus fixed costs, it means a business or specific department is profitable. If it’s negative, the business sees a loss that won’t enable it to pay its bills.

Illustrating CMAM

When it comes to a company producing widgets, the following is already known. Variable costs for production for a single widget are detailed below:

  • $2.25 for unprocessed inputs
  • $1.80 firsthand production expenses
  • $0.50 power
  • $0.40 freight expenses
  • $4,500 business equipment rentals
  • $6,000 factory rent
  • $30,000 management salary
  • $10,000 marketing costs

Each widget costs $10, and the business sold 30,000 last year. Therefore, it’s calculated as follows:

CMAM = Sales Revenue – Variable Costs – Marketing Expense

Sales Revenue = $10 x 30,000 = $300,000

Variable Costs = ($2.25 + $1.80 + $0.50+ $0.40) x 30,000 = $4.95 x 30,000 = $148,500

CMAM = $300,000 = $148,500

The next step is to calculate net operating loss or profit: we take CMAM ($148,500), then subtract fixed costs:

$148,500 – ($4,500 + $6,000 + $30,000)

$148,500 – $40,500 = $108,000

Based on that calculation, the company producing widgets realized $108,000 for its net operating profit last year. The next section will discuss how businesses can use this information to improve their operations.

Using CMAM for Business Analysis

Managers use this metric to determine the viability of a product. If there are multiple iterations or options of a product, it can help managers determine which product sells the best and rank them if there are multiple versions of a widget. Businesses can analyze each unit’s contribution margin for each version of a widget to determine which versions provide the greatest option for profitability. Depending on the outcome, the company may choose to produce only the most profitable one or two widgets.  

When it comes to the CMAM, businesses that use it for analysis can increase their sales efficiency for the present and future.

Initial Look at the New Tax Form Schedule 1-A: Four Key Deductions for 2025

Tax Form Schedule 1-AThe IRS has released draft Schedule 1-A, introducing four new temporary deductions within the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. If you are wondering what the new form looks like and how the calculations work, read on as we explore each below.

Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI)

It is important to note that all four deductions require calculating your MAGI first, which determines eligibility and phaseout amounts for each deduction.

The Four New Deductions and How the Calculations Work

These deductions are all referred to on the schedule by their colloquial names, for example: “No Tax on Tips,” “No Tax on Overtime” and “No Tax on Car Loan Interest.” The sole exception, however, is popularly referred to as the “No Tax on Social Security” provision, which is called the “Enhanced Deduction for Seniors” on the form.

1. Tips Deduction

  • Maximum: $25,000 annually
  • Eligibility: Must receive qualified tips in customarily tipped occupations
  • Phaseout: Begins at $150,000 MAGI ($300,000 joint filers)
  • Rate: $100 reduction per $1,000 over threshold
  • Requirements: Valid Social Security number; married couples must file jointly

2. Overtime Deduction

  • Maximum: $12,500 single ($25,000 joint filers)
  • Eligibility: Only the premium portion of overtime pay (the “half” of time-and-a-half)
  • Phaseout: Same as tips deduction – begins at $150,000 MAGI
  • Rate: $100 reduction per $1,000 over threshold

3. Car Interest Deduction

  • Maximum: $10,000 annually
  • Eligibility: Interest on loans for new vehicles under 14,000 pounds and assembled in the United States
  • Phaseout: Begins at $100,000 MAGI ($200,000 joint filers)
  • Rate: $200 reduction per $1,000 over threshold
  • Requirements: Must provide VIN; loan must originate after Dec. 31, 2024

4. Enhanced Deduction for Seniors

  • Amount: $6,000 fixed deduction
  • Eligibility: All taxpayers (replaces “No Tax on Social Security” promise)
  • Phaseout: Begins at $75,000 MAGI ($150,000 joint filers)
  • Rate: 6 percent reduction of excess income over threshold

Key Points to Remember

  • All deductions are available whether you itemize or take the standard deduction
  • All require valid Social Security numbers
  • Married couples must file jointly to claim these benefits
  • Income limits mean higher earners receive reduced or no benefits
  • These are deductions, not exclusions – income is still reportable for state/local taxes

Final Steps

After you have calculated everything applicable for the four possible deductions, you will enter the total on the new line 13b on Form 1040. The total amount of the deductions entered here is removed from your income prior to calculating your tax. Remember, these are deductions and not credits, so they only reduce your taxable income and are not a direct reduction in your tax due.

You can see an example of the new draft Form 1040 illustrating this below.

Screenshot of new Form 1040

Conclusion and Draft from Status – and IRS Warning

The above provides guidance to taxpayers and professionals on how both the deductions calculations work and flow through Form 1040. The IRS warns, however, that the forms and instructions currently released are in draft form at this point. Before any forms or instructions can be released in their final state, they need to be approved by the OMB. It is not unusual for draft releases of instructions and publications to have some changes before their final release, even if only minor.

 

Capitalizing Versus Expensing Research and Development

Capitalizing Versus Expensing Research and DevelopmentBased on statistics from the World Bank, the United States government spent 3.59 percent of its 2022 gross domestic product on research and development. While private businesses spend on their own research and development costs, it’s important for businesses to treat these expenditures appropriately.

When it comes to research and development outlays, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) dictate that businesses must expense them during the identical fiscal year as they’re consumed. Accordingly, this creates difficulties for investors and business owners alike in two ways. The first is more uncertain profitability and loss projections. The second is a murkier ability to quantify their rates of return on assets and investments.  

If R&D capitalization is minimal or non-existent by a company, it can imply the business’ total assets (or its total invested capital) doesn’t accurately represent how much has been put into such assets. This will affect the business’ Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC). This illustrates the importance in differences of how businesses treat their R&D expenses – using the balance sheet to capitalize and the income statement to expense.

Accounting Standards

Per International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), research outlays are classified as expenses annually, like GAAP. However, development costs may be capitalized for businesses with assets under incubation for saleable purposes (in other words, the tech/IP is expected to be approved and produce revenue in the future).

One consideration with IFRS is that a portion of research and development costs may be capitalized or recorded as an asset on the business’ balance sheet, instead of classified as an expense on the Profit and Loss Statement. It’s important, though, to understand that judgment is in the eye of the classification as to how commercially viable a product or service will be in the future, potentially causing issues on the company’s financial statements. Since research and development is sporadic, it impacts a business’ profitability. It’s seen in certain sectors, such as consumer discretionary, healthcare, and technology, to highlight a few.

With revenue, cash flow, and profit expected from the long-term investment of research and development, for products or services with a realistic chance, it should be capitalized and not expensed. Investors need to be aware of the differences in how businesses capitalize or expense their research and development spending, since, without additional financial analysis, it’s important to factor in research and development equally. This is because companies that don’t capitalize experience more unstable earnings.

Exploring Capitalization Versus Expensing

To determine the value and to capitalize such assets, analysts must project the asset’s lifespan to produce benefits (over its economic life) and go with that projection for the amortization period.

Amortization life varies between assets and is based on the economic life of the particular asset. Ways to determine the economic life depend on both the asset’s patentability and/or salability. If there’s a pharmaceutical drug with a 20-year patent, it’ll likely have a much longer life than the next mobile device or graphic processing unit (GPU).

Assuming an asset has a life of six years, the business would amortize equally over the six-year time frame. There can be a multitude of amortization approaches, but the straight-line method is used for the capitalized research and development expenses. It assumes the following figures:

$200,000 spent on R&D

$40,000 residual value

Based on the difference of $160,000 and the six-year economic life, each year would result in approximately $26,666 in amortization expense. After six years, the resulting value would be $40,000 in residual value.

Conclusion

Understanding the importance of accounting for R&D outlays is helpful for businesses to maximize investments for competitiveness and financial compliance.

Canceling Government Funding and Expanding Protections for Veterans

hr 4, hr 517, hr1316, s 423, hr1815, s 264, s201Rescissions Act of 2025 (HR 4) – A rescission bill cancels funding previously approved by Congress upon request by the president. Congress has 45 continuous legislative days to enact or reject the proposal, during which time the funds may be temporarily withheld. Introduced by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) on June 6, the House passed this bill on June 12 and the Senate passed it on July 17. Signed into law on July 24, this bill cancels nearly $9 billion in funding for a variety of programs, including foreign aid and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act (HR 517) – On July 24, the president signed into law this bill that allows taxpayers to postpone their filings if their state governor has declared a natural disaster, rather than waiting for the president to declare a federal disaster. The bill was introduced by Rep. David Kustoff on Jan. 16, passed in the House on March 31 and in the Senate on July 10.

Maintaining American Superiority by Improving Export Control Transparency Act (HR 1316) – Introduced by Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX) on Feb. 13, this legislation is designed to crack down on U.S. adversaries acquiring cutting-edge technology. The bill mandates that the Secretary of Commerce submit an annual report to Congress detailing dual-use export license applications and other requests for authorization for the export, re-export, release and in-country transfer of controlled items to arms-embargoed countries such as China, Russia, Iran and North Korea. The legislation was passed in the House on May 5, the Senate on May 22 and was signed into law on Aug. 19.

PRO Veterans Act of 2025 (S 423) – The purpose of this act is to prevent fraud and abuse via increased oversight of the Veterans Affairs Department, including critical skill bonuses paid out to senior executives. Moreover, the bill requires quarterly, in-person briefings to congressional veterans’ committees regarding VA departmental budget shortfalls. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) on Feb. 5, passed in the Senate on April 8 and in the House on July 21. The bill was enacted on Aug. 19.

VA Home Loan Program Reform Act (HR 1815) – This bill was introduced on March 3 by Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-WI), passed in the House on May 19, the Senate on July 15, and signed into law on July 30. The law reauthorizes the VA home loan partial claim and Veterans Affairs Servicing Purchase (VASP) programs. These programs are designed to help distressed veteran homeowners avoid foreclosure by enabling the VA to purchase a portion of indebtedness (25 percent to 30 percent of the unpaid principal balance) of a VA home loan secured by the primary residence of the borrower.

Improving Veterans’ Experience Act of 2025 (S 264) – This bill is meant to improve satisfaction with VA benefits and services by compiling feedback from veterans, families and caregivers. This legislation establishes a Veterans Experience Office (VEO) to manage customer experience initiatives, collect data and coordinate VA departments in order to prevent duplicate efforts and ensure consistent improvements across the board. The bill was introduced on Jan. 28 by Sen. Angus King (I-ME), passed in the Senate on April 8, the House on July 21 and was enacted on Aug. 14.

ACES Act of 2025 (S 201) – This act was introduced by Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) on Jan. 23. It directs the secretary of the VA to study cancer and mortality rates among aviators and aircrews who served in the Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps; and to correlate incidents of cancer among this select group of military personnel. The legislation passed in the Senate on June 3, the House on July 21, and was signed by the president on Aug. 14.