When reading
economic statistics,
you should see if
they are consistent
(they rarely are)
and make sense based
on real world
observations (lately
they don't). On
Thursday, December
3rd the U.S.
productivity numbers
were released, as
were same store
sales and weekly
unemployment claims.
The stories these
three pieces of data
are telling are
quite different,
which means at least
one and possibly two
of them are not
correct.
Productivity in the
U.S. is supposedly
up astronomically.
It rose by 8.1% last
quarter and this is
after being revised
down from being up
9.5%! The recent
downward revision of
third quarter GDP
from 3.5% to 2.8%
meant the
productivity numbers
would be lower as
well.
Productivity is essentially the amount of GDP produced per worker. Since employment is falling in the U.S. and GDP is supposedly rising (the two moving in opposite directions is illogical) productivity has to go up. According to the government, it is going up a huge amount. Is there any major new technological advance or innovation accounting for this? None, that anyone knows about.
Economists claim
that productivity
has gotten better
because the least
productive workers
have been fired.
While this might
give the numbers a
percentage or so
boost, it wouldn't
give them an 8%
boost. The
alternative
explanation is that
GDP is being grossly
overstated by the
U.S. government.
There is substantial
documentation that
this has indeed been
the case for the
last three decades.
Same store sales is
not a government
report and the
November numbers
clearly show an
economy in trouble.
Sales were down 0.3%
year over year.
While this may not
seem so bad
initially, it is
when you consider
sales were down 7.7%
last November, which
was the height of
the Credit Crisis
meltdown. They are
even lower now.
Analysts (who are
almost always wrong)
originally forecast
a 5% to 8% increase
for this November.
Consumer spending
accounts for 72% of
U.S. economic
activity and is
still obviously in
bad shape. Yet, the
government tells us
that GDP is growing
nicely. There seems
to be a
contradiction there.
If you read the
mainstream media
coverage of the
weekly jobless
claims you would
have seen that the
U.S. employment
situation is getting
better because there
were only 457,000
new claims during
the week of
Thanksgiving. Of
course, you might
consider that few
employers would lay
off workers right
before a major
holiday and that
state unemployment
offices were closed
because of the
holiday, so this
would obviously
lower claims.
The BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) states that they make some 'adjustments' for this though. Claims at even the 400,000 level indicate significant recession and they need to drop to the 300,000 level to indicate a healthy economy (you will see much higher numbers cited in most mainstream media reporting). Continuing claims are still rising and have hit 5.5 million. This number doesn't include an additional 4.5 million on extended umemployment benefits.
A large percentage of the American work force is not eligible to collect unemployment as is, so the numbers are even worse than they appear. While there are those who claim that unemployment is a lagging indicator, statistics from the past don't support this notion. The real lagging indicator seems to be the truth about what is really going on in the economy.



